Table 5.
Ways in which access to regular dry-eye related treatments changed during the pandemic.
Ways in which dry eye-related treatment changed during the pandemica | Respondents with MILD dry eye who lost access (N = 15) n (%) |
Respondents with MODERATE dry eye who lost access (N = 13) n (%) |
Respondents with SEVERE dry eyewho lost access (N = 65) n (%) |
ALL Respondentswho lost access (N = 93) n (%) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The over-the-counter products that I needed were not available. | 8 | (53) | 3 | (23) | 20 | (31) | 31 | (33) |
The over -the-counter products that I needed were available, but I could not afford them. | 2 | (13) | 0 | (0) | 3 | (5) | 5 | (5) |
The prescription treatments or devices that I needed were not available. | N/A | 4 | (31) | 17 | (26) | 21 | (23) | |
The prescription treatments or devices that I needed were available, but I could not afford them. | N/A | 1 | (8) | 10 | (15) | 11 | (12) | |
The in-office treatments that I needed were not available. | N/A | N/A | 13 | (20) | 13 | (14) | ||
The in-office treatments that I needed were available, but I could not afford them. | N/A | N/A | 2 | (3) | 2 | (2) | ||
I did not have the time to pursue the treatments that I needed. | 4 | (27) | 2 | (15) | 6 | (9) | 12 | (13) |
Other | 1 | (7) | 3 | (23) | 3 | (5) | 7 | (8) |
N/A = not applicable.
Respondents could select more than one response.