Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;10(9):giab063. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab063

Table 1:

Benchmarking SV recall, precision, and F1 on HG002 Human (hg19) ONT reads at varying coverages (10×, 20×, 30×)

Method Recall, % Precision, % F1, %
ONT 10×
minimap2 78.31 75.59 76.93
NGMLR 77.40 76.65 77.02
Vulcan
 60% 74.64 88.69 81.06
 70% 76.66 87.87 81.88
 80% 77.66 85.55 81.42
 90% 78.29 83.31 80.72
ONT20×
minimap2 83.55 76.13 79.67
NGMLR 83.39 76.24 79.66
Vulcan
 60% 83.78 77.71 80.63
 70% 83.91 78.53 81.13
 80% 83.50 79.57 81.49
 90% 83.55 80.65 82.08
ONT 30×
minimap2 88.74 77.37 82.66
NGMLR 88.47 77.79 82.79
Vulcan
 60% 89.37 79.11 83.93
 70% 89.36 79.87 84.35
 80% 89.24 80.71 84.76
 90% 88.81 81.40 84.94

Various percentile cut-offs for Vulcan were used, including 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%. SV calls based on Vulcan mappings achieve the highest F1 score for various cut-off values.