Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 19;12(5):931–942. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00498-0

Table 2.

Instruments and scoring of the consensus-based nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment

Domain Instrument Executed by Explanation Score/cut-off Duration (minutes)
Functional status Activities of daily living (Katz ADL-6) [25] P Grading of dependency on 6 functions, e.g., bathing, dressing, feeding 0–6 b, ≥ 2 indicates dependency 2
Instrumental Activities of daily living (Lawton) [26] P Grading of dependency on 8 more complex functions, e.g., ability to use telephone, housekeeping, medication 0–8 for women, 0–5 for men. Higher scores indicate more independency, no cut-off point 2
Handgrip strength I Best of 3 repetitive measurements with dominant hand (i.e., no vascular access) Reference value depending on age and gender [62] 4
Fall risk assessment I 1-year fall history and fear of falling Yes/no; 1 (‘no fear’) to 10 (‘very afraid’) 1
Cognitive functioning Montreal Cognitive Assessment [29] I Screening for mild cognitive impairment in 8 domains (i.e., visuospatial, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, orientation) 0–30, < 26 indication of cognitive impairment 10
6-item Cognitive Impairment Test [31] I 6-item screening for dementia, assessing orientation, attention, and memory 0–28, ≥ 11 indication of cognitive impairment 2–3
Letter Digit Substitution Test [30] I Speed dependent task to measure speed of processing by matching letters to corresponding numbers provided in the key Number of correct substitutions at 60 s; reference values depend on age, gender, education level [63] 5
Psychological status/mood Whooley questions/Geriatric Depression Scale-15 [33, 34] Ia

Two initial question on depressed mood and anhedonia in the past month

If yes on at least one question, 15-item GDS assesses presence and degree of depressive symptoms

Yes/no

0–15, (≥ 6 indicative of depression) [64]

1

5–7

Life Orientation Test-Revised [35] P Dispositional optimism is measured by 10 items (including 4 filler items). Calculation of a total score, or the pessimism (reversed score on items 3, 7, 9) and optimism (items 1,4, 10) constructs separately

0 (‘strongly disagree’) to 4 (‘strongly agree’)

0–24 total score, or 0–12 per construct. Higher scores indicate more optimism, reference values depend on age and gender [65]

 < 3
Patient reported outcome measures HRQoL: 12-item Short Form Health Survey [41] P 12 items on HRQoL providing a mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS), using three- or five-point Likert scales 0–100, higher scores indicating better HRQoL  ≤ 2 c
Dialysis Symptom Index [42] P Measuring symptom burden, by indicating presence of 30 or any other additional symptoms. If present, patients are asked to specify for the degree of bothersome Yes/no, if yes 1 (‘not at all’) to 5 (‘very much’) 2–15 c
Somatic status Surprise question [40] C Clinicians response to the question: “Would I be surprised if the patient died in the next 12 months?” assessed by nephrologist, geriatrician and/or nurse (practitioner) Yes/no 1
Clinical Frailty Score [36], C Clinical judgement on a visual and written chart with 9 graded pictures. d 1 (‘very fit’) to 9 (‘terminally ill’)  < 1
Charlson Comorbidity Index [37] C Comorbid conditions weighted for increased severity of the condition 1 to 6 points per condition, total range of 0–33 4
Polypharmacy C Assessed by means of the total number of different medication for chronic use (i.e., for more than 2 weeks) Use of five or more medications daily 2
Nutrition Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment [45]

P

P/I

Short Form includes 4 self-reported items on weight development, food intake, symptoms, and activities

Complete PG-SGA: 5 additional items to be filled in by a clinician or dietician (diagnosis, age, metabolic stress, physical examination) to assess numerical score

Short Form only: 0–36 (≥ 6 indicates malnutrition)

Complete PG-SGA: 0–52 (≥ 9 indicates malnutrition)[46]

1

5–10

Social Caregiver burden: EDIZ-plus [47] CG Self-perceived burden from informal care measured in 15-statements to ‘agree’, ‘neither agree/nor disagree’ or ‘disagree'

1 point per question answered with ‘agree’;

0 (‘no burden’), 1–3 (‘minor burden’), 4–8 (‘moderate burden’), 9–15 (‘severe burden’)

5

P patient, I interviewer, C clinician, CG caregiver, NA not available, HRQoL health-related quality of life, EDIZ Ervaren Druk door Informele Zorg [Self-perceived burden from informal care]

aGDS can be either self-administered or by an interviewer, for more in-depth assessment interviewer-administered is preferred

bScore range 0–12 for the ternary-answering version

c12 min on average for both measures

dThe initial seven-point scale version was expanded to a nine-point scale by the authors of the clinical fraily scale