Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;49(17):e102. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab576

Table 5.

EMD from predicted haplotypes to the true haplotype population for 1K-, 2K-, 5K-long and full-length genomic regions for HIV, HCV and ZIKV benchmarks

CliqueSNV
Benchmark Length Consensus 2% 5% 10% PredictHaplo aBayesQR
HCV10sim 1K 1.109 0.080 0.037 0.143 1.479 did not finish
2K 3.397 0.714 0.854 1.923 0.981 did not finish
5K 3.719 3.729 3.729 1.431 0.450 did not finish
full-length 3.335 3.335 3.335 1.217 0.140 did not finish
ZIKV3sim 1K 2.408 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.100 0.086
2K 2.388 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.092 did not finish
5K 2.182 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.031 did not finish
full-length 2.168 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.016 did not finish
ZIKV15sim 1K 3.368 1.123 1.335 1.840 3.640 1.345
2K 3.571 1.469 1.339 3.128 7.037 1.807
5K 3.506 1.379 1.778 1.698 6.701 did not finish
full-length 3.803 1.254 1.643 2.801 6.014 did not finish
HIV5full 1K 1.480 0.696 0.350 0.590 0.943 1.405
2K 3.460 2.081 2.100 2.626 2.825 3.100
5K 2.384 2.219 1.500 1.997 2.267 did not finish
full-length 3.189 2.968 2.557 2.273 1.811 did not finish
Average over all benchmarks 2.957 1.401 1.371 1.438 2.203 1.548*

The EMD is normalized by the genomic region length, i.e. we report the EMD per 100 genomic positions. Comparison is performed for Clique-SNV with three different frequency thresholds: 2, 5 (default) and 10%, aBayesQR and PredictHaplo . The aBayesQR did not finish in majority of samples. The best EMD for each benchmark is in bold font.