Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 25;37:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100501

Table 2.

Summary of AICc (for training data), RMSE (for test data) and RC values for different models calculated based on the epidemic data of six provinces/cities in China.

Heilongjiang
Tianjin
Hunan
Guangdong
Chongqing
Xiaogan
Model AICc RMSE RC AICc RMSE RC AICc RMSE RC AICc RMSE RC AICc RMSE RC AICc RMSE RC
Hill’s 5.9 16 0.62 3.58 69 0.79 6.09 122 0.67 6.76 447 0.42 7.42 61 0.83 10.71 73 0.66
Logistic 5.26 46 0.89 3.48 15 0.78 7.43 178 0.89 6.09 113 0.90 6.74 75 0.82 10.17 363 0.90
Gompertz’s 5.87 112 0.53 3.36 20 0.45 6.16 18 0.86 6.55 719 0.58 6.15 29 0.71 10.57 240 0.69
Richards’ 6.08 101 0.92 3.61 62 0.78 6.47 132 0.93 6.86 105 0.71 6.47 77 0.88 10.79 623 0.93
G-Logistic 5.23 79 0.78 3.58 47 0.01 6.00 76 0.39 6.40 98 0.57 5.70 314 0.01 10.28 481 0.79

Exp.Growth 6.21 34 0.85 3.55 6.6 0.60 7.92 28 0.89 6.43 41 0.86 6.96 46 0.80 10.96 322 0.95
Max.LLH 7.21 283 0.31 4.04 57 0.11 8.80 475 0.56 7.82 698 0.54 7.43 260 0.40 11.73 3.1e3 0.72
Seq.Bayes. 5.30 27 0.08 3.36 7 0.65 8.87 176 0.57 7.53 434 0.02 6.50 68 0.44 10.86 242 0.58
TimeDep. 5.50 71 0.72 3.29 17 0.05 8.49 279 0.88 6.08 43 0.62 7.00 126 0.82 10.04 296 0.88

SIR 6.75 2.1e3 0.94 3.45 161 0.99 8.13 3.2e3 0.92 7.78 1.9e4 0.93 5.25 666 0.98 11.56 8.3e3 0.99
SEIR 6.98 2.1e3 0.78 3.66 169 0.68 8.55 3.1e3 0.44 8.11 2.1e4 0.30 5.58 390 0.47 11.69 6.8e3 0.65
SEIR-QD 3.13 6.8 0.90 3.15 7.0 0.86 4.27 25 0.77 5.52 107 0.76 3.15 7.0 0.88 5.86 156 0.76
SEIR-AHQ 9.38 38 0.81 7.84 17 0.37 13.80 336 0.66 13.84 351 0.57 12.03 138 0.42 15.07 601 0.38
SEIR-PO 4.56 29 0.78 4.20 19 0.63 5.50 85 0.71 6.32 217 0.60 4.42 24 0.73 6.18 185 0.84