Table 4.
Hierarchal linear regression on satisfaction with life
| Variable | Life satisfaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE) | β | p-value | |
| Step 1: R2 = .33, F(4,85) = 10.59, p < .001 | |||
| Relationship status: partnereda | 0.24 (0.30) | 0.08 | .420 |
| Education: lowerb | − 0.72 (0.25) | − 0.26 | .005 |
| Diagnosis: brain tumorc | − 0.48 (0.29) | − 0.16 | .106 |
| Growing up slowerd | − 1.54 (0.36) | − 0.39 | .000 |
| Step 2: R2 = .44, F(7,82) = 9.09, p < .001 | |||
| Relationship status: partnereda | 0.35 (0.32) | 0.12 | .272 |
| Education: lowerb | − 0.21 (0.27) | − 0.07 | .454 |
| Diagnosis: brain tumorc | − 0.08 (0.30) | − 0.03 | .787 |
| Growing up slowerd | − 1.08 (0.36) | − 0.27 | .004 |
| Financial maturity | 0.25 (0.17) | 0.18 | .146 |
| Social maturity | 0.03 (0.19) | 0.02 | .880 |
| Personal maturity | 0.45 (0.24) | 0.26 | .061 |
ΔR2 = .10, ΔF(3,82) = 5.07, p = .003; reference categories: avs. single; bvs. high; cvs. non-CNS; dvs. similar/faster