Table 1.
Variable | Expression of MT2A in Cancer Stroma 1 | Expression of MT2A in Cancer Nest 1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Cases | Low | High | Number of Cases | Low | High | |||
(n = 43) | (n = 26) | p-Value | (n = 31) | (n = 38) | p-Value | |||
Age | ||||||||
<65 | 32 | 20 | 12 | 0.997 | 32 | 13 | 19 | 0.504 |
≥65 | 37 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 18 | 19 | ||
Sex | ||||||||
Male | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0.654 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 0.862 |
Female | 55 | 35 | 20 | 55 | 25 | 30 | ||
Histological grade 2 | ||||||||
HGIEN + WDSCC | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0.320 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0.459 |
MDSCC + PDSCC | 54 | 32 | 22 | 54 | 23 | 31 | ||
Depth of tumor invasion 2 | ||||||||
T1 | 48 | 36 | 12 | 0.001 ** | 48 | 25 | 23 | 0.071 |
T2+T3 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 6 | 15 | ||
Lymphatic vessel invasion 2 | ||||||||
Negative | 37 | 31 | 6 | <0.001 *** | 37 | 19 | 18 | 0.249 |
Positive | 32 | 12 | 20 | 32 | 12 | 20 | ||
Blood vessel invasion 2 | ||||||||
Negative | 43 | 32 | 11 | 0.008 ** | 43 | 20 | 23 | 0.734 |
Positive | 26 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 11 | 15 | ||
Lymph node metastasis 2 | ||||||||
Negative | 43 | 31 | 12 | 0.031 * | 43 | 22 | 21 | 0.181 |
Positive | 26 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 9 | 17 | ||
Stage 3 | ||||||||
0 + I | 38 | 28 | 10 | 0.031 * | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0.348 |
II + III + IV | 31 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 12 | 19 | ||
Expression of αSMA 4 | ||||||||
Low | 36 | 31 | 5 | <0.001 *** | 36 | 16 | 20 | 0.933 |
High | 33 | 12 | 21 | 33 | 15 | 18 | ||
Expression of FAP 4 | ||||||||
Low | 39 | 33 | 6 | <0.001 *** | 39 | 19 | 20 | 0.470 |
High | 30 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 12 | 18 | ||
Expression of CD163 5 | ||||||||
Low | 34 | 27 | 7 | 0.004 ** | 34 | 16 | 18 | 0.726 |
High | 35 | 16 | 19 | 35 | 15 | 20 | ||
Expression of CD204 5 | ||||||||
Low | 34 | 31 | 3 | <0.001 *** | 34 | 16 | 18 | 0.726 |
High | 35 | 12 | 23 | 35 | 15 | 20 |
Data were analyzed by χ2-test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. 1 The ESCC tissues were divided into two groups (high- and low-) based on the immunoreactivity intensity of MT2A in cancer stroma or cancer nest. 2 Based on the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer 10th ed [21]. HGIEN, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; WDSCC, well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; MDSCC, moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; PDSCC, poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. T1, tumor invades mucosa and submucosa; T2, tumor invades muscularis propria; T3, tumor invades adventitia. 3 Based on the TNM classification 7th ed. by UICC [22]. 4 Immunoreactivity at the invasive front of ESCC was classified based on the staining area (high: >30%; low: ≤30%) [16]. 5 The median of CD163+ or CD204+ macrophage counts in cancer nests and stroma within the areas were used to classify the patients as low- and high-groups [24].