Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Sep 19;9(9):1990. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091990

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2021 by the authors.

Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

PMC Copyright notice

Impacts of teak rhizosphere microbes on stem length (A), leaf number per plant (B), and stem circumference of teak seedlings. Different treatments were established, including an uninoculated control and those inoculated with Agrobacterium sp. CGC-5, Kitasatospora sp. TCM1-050, Claroideoglomus sp. PBT03, or different consortia of these microbes. The experiments were done in five replicates. Small case letters refer to the statistical difference of means compared by one-way ANOVA at α = 0.05. The statistical results comprise of (A) length of stem at 1-months-old (F_{(7, 32)} = 1.60, p = 0.17), 2-months-old (F_{(7, 32)} = 1.29, p = 0.29), and 3-months-old (F_{(7, 32)} = 3.13, p ≤ 0.0005), (B) number of leave per plant at 1-months-old (F_{(7, 32)} = 0.53, p = 0.80), 2-months-old (F_{(7, 32)} = 1.36, p = 0.25), and 3-months-old (F_{(7, 32)} = 1.52, p = 0.195), and (C) circumference of stem (F_{(7, 32)} = 1.25, p = 0.31). The asterisk remark indicates the statistical significance, while “ns” refers to “no significance”.