Table 5.
Pairwise comparison of glycemic index among all pasta samples.
| Two Comparison Samples | Difference | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICS-COMM | −3.7 | −27.0 | 19.6 | 0.997 |
| RU DIMESA-COMM ** | 21.4 | −2.0 | 44.7 | 0.092 |
| RU PONTE-COMM | 18.4 | −4.9 | 41.7 | 0.205 |
| TI DIMESA-COMM | 19.3 | −4.0 | 42.6 | 0.164 |
| TI PONTE-COMM * | 25.3 | 2.0 | 48.6 | 0.026 |
| RU DIMESA-ICS * | 25.1 | 2.2 | 48.0 | 0.024 |
| RU PONTE-ICS ** | 22.1 | −0.8 | 45.0 | 0.065 |
| TI DIMESA-ICS * | 23.0 | 0.1 | 45.9 | 0.049 |
| TI PONTE-ICS * | 29.0 | 6.1 | 51.9 | 0.005 |
| RU PONTE-RU DIMESA | −3.0 | −25.9 | 19.9 | 0.999 |
| TI DIMESA-RU DIMESA | −2.1 | −25.0 | 20.8 | 1.000 |
| TI PONTE-RU DIMESA | 3.9 | −19.0 | 26.8 | 0.996 |
| TI DIMESA-RU PONTE | 0.9 | −22.0 | 23.8 | 1.000 |
| TI PONTE-RU PONTE | 6.9 | −16.0 | 29.8 | 0.950 |
| TI PONTE-TI DIMESA | 6.0 | −16.9 | 28.9 | 0.972 |
C.I.= Confidence Interval; * Marginal significant difference; ** Significant difference.