Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 19;14(18):5428. doi: 10.3390/ma14185428

Table 1.

Comparison of removal rates of relative abundance of each ARG by adding different additives (over 66 d).

Treatments ermB ermF sul1 sul2 sul3 tetA tetG tetM tetO IntI1
CT 13.8% a 96.2% c 87.5% c 93.0% c 96.0% b 59.3% d 88.7% c -- 23.1% d 96.9% c
HT 14.7% a 96.6% b,c 95.5% a 97.5% b 98.5% a 77.2% c 88.2% d 42.6% 60.0% c 97.7% b
HT2C 11.0% b 97.9% a,b 94.8% b 99.3% a,b 98.4% a 86.6% b 93.4% a -- 77.9% b 99.3% a
HT5C 7.9% c 98.5% a 95.3% a 99.5% a 98.8% a 92.2% a 91.6% b -- 80.1% a 99.3% a

The different lowercase in the table indicated significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05 level.