Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 24;11(9):1529. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091529

Table 3.

A comparison of isokinetic shoulder strength between symptomatic limbs, asymptomatic limbs in patients with NTOS and limb controls (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn post hoc test).

Symptomatic Limbs
n = 133
Asymptomatic Limbs
n = 67
Control Limbs
n = 200
H p
Dom/non-Dom, n 74/59 26/41 100/100 0.08 #
MR 60°/s, Nm/kg 0.46 ± 0.16 a*** 0.52 ± 0.16 b** 0.58 ± 0.15 a***, b** 46.6 <0.0001
LR 60°/s, Nm/kg 0.20 ± 0.09 a*** 0.23 ± 0.09 b** 0.28 ± 0.09 a***, b** 56.9 <0.0001
MR 180°/s, Nm/kg 0.41 ± 0.16 a*** 0.45 ± 0.15 b*** 0.53 ± 0.14 a***, b*** 48.5 <0.0001
LR 180°/s, Nm/kg 0.20 ± 0.07 a*** 0.22 ± 0.09 b** 0.25 ± 0.07 a***, b** 45.3 <0.0001
MR endurance, J/kg 10.0 ± 6.1 a*** 12.75 ± 6.0 b*** 18.1 ± 5.5 a***, b*** 125.9 <0.0001
LR endurance, J/kg 2.49 ± 2.2 a***, c** 3.56 ± 2.7 b***, c** 5.4 ± 2.9 a***, b*** 105.2 <0.0001

Dom: dominant upper-limb; non-Dom: non-dominant upper-limb; MR 60°/s: medial rotators at 60°/s; LR 60°/s: lateral rotators at 60°/s; MR 180°/s: medial rotators at 180°/s; LR 180°/s: lateral rotators at 180°/s; Nm: Newton-meter; SD: standard deviation; #: χ2 test for the 3 populations. a: Significant difference between symptomatic limbs and controls; b: Significant difference between asymptomatic limbs and controls; c: Significant difference between symptomatic limbs and asymptomatic limbs. Dunn’s test: ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001. H: H-statistic of the Kruskal-Wallis test.