Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 30;11(9):666. doi: 10.3390/membranes11090666

Table 6.

Summary of representative performances for MMMs with binary fillers in H2-based separation.

Membrane Separation Performance Ref.
Filler Polymer/Support Test
Condition
Permeation Area (cm2) P(H2)
(GPU)
Selectivity
H2/CO2 H2/CH4 H2/N2
UiO-66 + GO (8 wt%) PSF 35 °C - 12 a
(0%)
- 60
(+2%)
- [135]
UiO-66 + GO (8 wt%) PI 35 °C - 41 a
(+32%)
- 136
(+1%)
- [135]
MCM-41 +
MIL-53(Al)-NH2
(8 wt%)
PSF 35 °C 15.2 20 a
(+67%)
- 67
(+14%)
- [147]
MCM-41 +
MIL-53(Al)-NH2
(8 wt%)
PI 35 °C 15.2 16 a
(−47%)
- 132
(0%)
- [147]
MCM-41 +
JDF-L1 (8 + 4 wt%)
6FDA-based
copolyimide
35 °C - 440 a
(+41%)
- 32
(+68%)
- [148]
HKUST-1 +
Silicalite-1 (8 wt%)
PSF 35 °C 15.2 16 a
(+33%)
- 83
(+38%)
- [149]
ZIF-8 + Silicalite-1
(8 wt%)
PSF 35 °C 15.2 17 a
(+42%)
- 74
(+23%)
- [149]

a Permeability reported in the units of barrer; numbers in the parentheses represent the percentage enhancements with respect to the pristine polymeric membranes; 6FDA, 4,4′(hexafluoroisopropylidene)diphthalic anhydride; PI, polyimide; PSF, polysulfone.