Abstract
(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic impacts healthcare utilization across all care settings and health conditions. The objective of this study was to determine changes in hospital admissions for neurodegenerative diseases (NDD) during the first COVID-19 wave in Germany; (2) Methods: This cross-sectional study used nationwide administrative claims data covering 1468 hospitals. The primary outcome was the year-to-year relative change in case numbers during a four-month study period (16 January–15 May 2020 vs. 2019) during the first pandemic wave. Secondary outcomes included year-to-year relative changes during a four-week peak phase (16 March–15 April) and changes between differential phases of the wave. The analyzed NDD comprised progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Huntington’s disease; (3) Results: Hospital admissions for any reason decreased by 16.7% in 2020 during the study period and by 36.6% during the peak phase, whereas admissions for NDD decreased by 27.6% and 65.0%, respectively. PSP cases decreased during the study period (−34.7%) and the peak phase (−68.1%) and stayed reduced in a late phase with falling COVID-19 numbers. MSA and ALS cases increased strongest after the peak, with ALS cases being comparatively weakly reduced during the study period (−17.3%) and peak phase (−51.7%); (4) Conclusions: Inpatient care utilization for NDD changed differentially during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany and showed a greater reduction than overall and general neurological admissions. Mitigating long-term health deterioration of this vulnerable subgroup is important to reduce morbidity and mortality in the future.
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, COVID-19, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
1. Introduction
The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020 [1]. From March 16 onwards, German hospitals were required to postpone elective inpatient treatments in order to increase intensive care capacities for COVID-19 patients [2]. A lockdown including social distancing measures and reduction of economic and public life started on 22 March and was loosened from 6 May 2020 onwards [3]. As a result, overall hospital admissions declined by 35% during the four weeks after 16 March compared to 2018, as an analysis of 18 German university hospitals has shown [4].
The COVID-19 pandemic thus impacts healthcare delivery and utilization, which has been shown to occur across all care settings and health conditions [5,6] including neurological diseases [7,8]. Rather than by COVID-19 itself, this impact is mediated by responses of society and individuals to COVID-19. These responses comprise containment strategies (e.g., stay-at-home orders, curfews, socioeconomic lockdowns), mitigation strategies of high-level COVID-19 caseload (e.g., postponing non-urgent hospital admissions) and affective and behavioral changes of individuals (e.g., fears of contracting the virus, social distancing measures). Eventually, they might lead to altered healthcare delivery and utilization, e.g., to a decline in hospital admissions for conditions other than COVID-19.
Research on these indirect health effects [5] of the COVID-19 pandemic primarily focused on reduction of overall patient numbers, on urgent medical conditions (e.g., oncological treatments), and on emergencies such as cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases [5,8]. However, chronic neurological conditions, such as neurodegenerative diseases (NDD), also require continued and comprehensive healthcare, including hospital admissions in case of an exacerbation. Accordingly, the management of existing chronic neurological conditions is a key point of the EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic [9]. Various publications have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly affects the lives of people living with NDD, for example, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [10,11], multiple system atrophy (MSA) [12] or Parkinson’s disease (PD) [13,14]. For PD, a recent analysis showed reductions of hospital admissions by up to 72.7% during the first pandemic wave [7]. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data on changes in inpatient care utilization for the broad spectrum of further NDD including movement disorders such as MSA and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP).
Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine changes in the numbers of hospital admissions for various NDD during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.
2. Materials and Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study using the nationwide administrative claims database covering 1468 hospitals and 11,464,523 patient admissions between 16 January and 15 May 2020 (5,210,432) and 2019 (6,254,091), respectively. The high-quality and validated diagnosis-related group (DRG) database has been described in detail previously for this purpose [7]. No informed consent or ethical approval was required, as this analysis of anonymized secondary data was provided by the German Federal Statistical Office complying with the German data protection regulations. Data were retrieved retrospectively on 19 October 2020. The primary outcome was the year-to-year relative change in inpatient case numbers of NDD patients during a four-month period covering the first pandemic wave (16 January–15 May 2020). The analyzed NDD comprised PSP, MSA, PD, ALS, and Huntington’s disease (HD). Accordingly, inclusion criteria comprised the presence of the respective ICD/DRG codes, whereas any other ICD code served as an exclusion criterion, together with key “06” (discharge to another hospital), thereby avoiding multiple counting. Overall hospital admissions were used as a reference. According to the dynamic of COVID-19 cases [7], we divided the course of the first wave of the pandemic into four phases of a one-month duration each, including a prodromal, an early, a peak, and a late phase with corresponding inpatient numbers of COVID-19 (Figure 1b, Table 1). Secondary outcomes included year-to-year relative changes during the predefined four-week peak phase. Furthermore, we investigated pre/post relative changes between the different phases of the first wave to account for temporal trends. We used the main diagnosis codes according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision, German Modification (ICD-10-GM), as shown in Table 1. The statistical analysis was done in a descriptive approach.
Table 1.
Disease | ICD−Code | Case Number | Relative Change | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Prodromal | Early | Peak | Late | Peak vs. Early | Late vs. Early | Late vs. Peak | |||
16 Jan−15 May | 16 Jan−15 Feb | 16 Feb−15 Mar | 16 Mar−15 Apr | 16 Apr−15 May | ||||||
COVID−19 | U07.1 | 2020 | 30,827 | 90 | 1818 | 21,918 | 7001 | 1105.6% | 285.1% | −68.1% |
All admissions | All ICD | 2019 | 6,254,091 | 1,719,250 | 1,509,265 | 1,540,771 | 1,484,805 | 2.1% | −1.6% | −3.6% |
2020 | 5,210,432 | 1,657,386 | 1,485,173 | 976,590 | 1,091,283 | −34.2% | −26.5% | 11.7% | ||
Diff. | −1,043,659 | −61,864 | −24,092 | −564,181 | −393,522 | |||||
Diff. % | −16.7% | −3.6% | −1.6% | −36.6% | −26.5% | |||||
All NDD | G10 + G12.2 + G20 + G23.1 + G23.2 + G23.3 | 2019 | 19,232 | 5239 | 4568 | 4856 | 4569 | 6.3% | 0.0% | −5.9% |
2020 | 13,920 | 5102 | 4609 | 1699 | 2510 | −63.1% | −45.5% | 47.7% | ||
Diff. | −5312 | −137 | 41 | −3157 | −2059 | |||||
Diff. % | −27.6% | −2.6% | 0.9% | −65.0% | −45.1% | |||||
PD | G20 | 2019 | 15,854 | 4315 | 3782 | 3971 | 3786 | 5.0% | 0.1% | −4.7% |
2020 | 11,262 | 4182 | 3819 | 1326 | 1935 | −65.3% | −49.3% | 45.9% | ||
Diff. | −4592 | −133 | 37 | −2645 | −1851 | |||||
Diff. % | −29.0% | −3.1% | 1.0% | −66.6% | −48.9% | |||||
MSA | G23.2 + G23.3 | 2019 | 457 | 127 | 102 | 120 | 108 | 17.6% | 5.9% | −10.0% |
2020 | 341 | 122 | 115 | 32 | 72 | −72.2% | −37.4% | 125.0% | ||
Diff. | −116 | −5 | 13 | −88 | −36 | |||||
Diff. % | −25.4% | −3.9% | 12.7% | −73.3% | −33.3% | |||||
PSP | G23.1 | 2019 | 645 | 187 | 160 | 163 | 135 | 1.9% | −15.6% | −17.2% |
2020 | 421 | 146 | 151 | 52 | 72 | −65.6% | −52.3% | 38.5% | ||
Diff. | −224 | −41 | −9 | −111 | −63 | |||||
Diff. % | −34.7% | −21.9% | −5.6% | −68.1% | −46.7% | |||||
HD | G10 | 2019 | 139 | 29 | 31 | 43 | 36 | 38.7% | 16.1% | −16.3% |
2020 | 128 | 46 | 42 | 19 | 21 | −54.8% | −50.0% | 10.5% | ||
Diff. | −11 | 17 | 11 | −24 | −15 | |||||
Diff. % | −7.9% | 58.6% | 35.5% | −55.8% | −41.7% | |||||
ALS | G12.2 | 2019 | 2137 | 581 | 493 | 559 | 504 | 13.4% | 2.2% | −9.8% |
2020 | 1768 | 606 | 482 | 270 | 410 | −44.0% | −14.9% | 51.9% | ||
Diff. | −369 | 25 | −11 | −289 | −94 | |||||
Diff. % | −17.3% | 4.3% | −2.2% | −51.7% | −18.7% |
3. Results
Case numbers of the analyzed NDD and COVID-19 during the analyzed period in 2020 and 2019 as well as relative changes between years and between phases of the first wave are displayed in Table 1.
As shown previously [7], overall hospital admissions decreased by 16.7% during the analyzed four-month period between 16 January and 15 May 2020, compared to 2019 (Figure 1a). Hospital admissions dropped by 36.6% during the four-week peak phase starting on March 16 (Table 1). Patients with NDD were even less frequently admitted in 2020 (full period: −27.6%; peak phase: −65.0%). The subgroup of PSP cases showed the most substantial decline during the full period (−34.7%), while PD (−29.0%) and MSA (−25.4%) admissions decreased within a range around the average of the NDD group. ALS (−17.3%) and HD (−7.9%) decreased less intensely. In general, case numbers of MSA and especially HD were small (<400; Table 1), which is why we focused on PSP and ALS.
During the sharp rise in COVID-19 cases between the early and the peak phase, NDD cases decreased by 63.1% in pre/post comparison, again stronger than overall admissions (−34.2%). By analogy with year-to-year comparison, strong relative changes occurred in PSP (−65.6%) admissions, while ALS (−44.0%) cases decreased less intensely than average. With the substantial drop of COVID-19 cases in the second half of April, i.e., the start of the late phase, all NDD admissions increased again (+11.7% compared to the peak phase). Together with MSA (+125.0%), ALS increased most strongly (+51.9%), whereas PSP (+38.5%) and HD (+10.5%) increased the least.
As an indicator of a more sustained reduction of admissions, relative changes of case numbers between the early and the late phase were high for PSP (−52.3%), whereas ALS cases were reduced least (−14.9%) after the peak phase.
4. Discussion
In order to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on inpatient care of various neurodegenerative diseases during the first wave in Germany, we conducted a cross-sectional study using a high-quality nationwide administrative claims database.
The key findings are that (1) a reduction of inpatient care utilization was pronounced for NDD; (2) PSP cases decreased strongly both during the four-week peak phase and during the entire period, with sustained depression in the late phase with falling COVID-19 case numbers; (3) MSA and ALS cases increased most strongly after the peak, with ALS cases being overall less affected by the reduction of admissions during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The decline in overall hospital admissions of 36.6% is in line with a previous finding of 35% from a study of 18 German university hospitals applying a similar period of interest [4]. A meta-analysis including 32 studies on admission changes for different reasons for admission during early pandemic periods reported a median reduction in admissions of 28% compared to pre-pandemic periods [6]. During the peak phase, the decline of admissions was pronounced for NDD compared to diseases of the nervous system in general (−65.0% vs. −51.1%) [4].
The strong and sustained decrease in admissions for PSP could imply a cautious attitude in people living with PSP. For PD, worries and anxiety associated with COVID-19 have been described [14] and represent one possible reason for this finding. It seems unlikely that falls as a reason for admission in PSP occurred less during lockdown. Possibly, a higher proportion of patients with Richardson’s syndrome (PSP-RS) could account for the strong decrease in admissions as this subtype is characterized by a more rapid motor progression than, e.g., the parkinsonism subtype (PSP-P). Yet, the available database does not provide PSP subtype information. As mentioned in the introductory section, stay-at-home orders and reduced inpatient care supply are further reasons for reduced admissions.
The comparatively weaker reduction of admissions for ALS could imply that a high demand for inpatient care outbalanced caution or fears in ALS patients and their caregivers. Common reasons for hospital admission in ALS are respiratory failure, nutritional deficiency, and pneumonia, rendering those admissions mostly non-elective [15].
In order to ensure continued and comprehensive care of people living with NDD and to mitigate health deterioration caused by the pandemic, quick (re-)access to multidisciplinary care and telemedicine play a key role [16], the latter being utilized increasingly since the pandemic’s beginning [17]. In this context, the Bioethics Study Group of the Italian Neurological Society advocates the concept of preparedness when implementing action strategies in public health to be ready for future emergencies caused by pandemics [18].
In the future, both indirect (e.g., changes in hospital care utilization) and direct health effects (e.g., possible causation or exacerbation of NDD) of the COVID-19 pandemic most likely will continue to affect people living with NDD. Even if some studies suggest a causal role of SARS-CoV-2 for neurodegeneration [19], long-term data on COVID-19-related incidence of NDD and conclusive evidence on underlying mechanisms, such as neurodegeneration secondary to microglial neuroinflammation [20], are currently lacking [21,22,23]. Therefore, the question whether or not the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to increased numbers of NDD admissions in the long-term can only be answered by future epidemiological research [21,23]. Limitations of this report include small group sizes, especially for HD and MSA. Additionally, the database does not provide information on reasons for hospital admission. Possible heterogeneities of disease subgroups, such as PSP Richardson’s syndrome or PSP parkinsonism, could not be considered comprehensively. Further studies are needed to study the indirect health effects of COVID-19 on NDD patients and to evaluate the long-term effects of reduced healthcare utilization for patients with chronic neurological conditions, including the risk of higher morbidity and mortality.
The strengths of this analysis are the nationwide range and the first-time description of indirect health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on various NDD.
To conclude, inpatient care utilization changed differentially across various NDD during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany and showed a greater reduction than overall and general neurological admissions. Mitigating long-term health deterioration is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality in the future.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.T., D.B. and R.S.; methodology, D.B. and R.S.; formal analysis, R.S.; resources, R.G., C.K. and L.T.; data curation, D.B. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S. and L.T..; writing—review and editing, D.R., D.B., E.-H.K., R.G. and C.K.; supervision, L.T.; project administration, C.K. and L.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
No ethical approval was required because data were publicly available, anonymized, and complied with the German data protection regulations.
Informed Consent Statement
Patient consent was waived due to public availability and anonymization of data, along with accordance with the German data protection regulations.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.World Health Organization WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19, 11 March 2020. [(accessed on 18 February 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020.
- 2.Press and Information Office of the Federal Government of the Federal Republic of Germany Meeting of the Federal Chancellor with the Heads of Government of the Länder on 12 March 2020 (German) [(accessed on 18 February 2021)]. Available online: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/coronavirus/beschluss-zu-corona-1730292.
- 3.Press and Information Office of the Federal Government of the Federal Republic of Germany Conference Call between the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Heads of Government of the Länder on May 6, 2020 (German) [(accessed on 18 February 2021)]. Available online: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/suche/telefonschaltkonferenz-der-bundeskanzlerin-mit-den-regierungschefinnen-und-regierungschefs-der-laender-am-06-mai-2020-1750988.
- 4.Kapsner L.A., Kampf M.O., Seuchter S.A., Gruendner J., Gulden C., Mate S., Mang J.M., Schüttler C., Deppenwiese N., Krause L., et al. Reduced Rate of Inpatient Hospital Admissions in 18 German University Hospitals During the COVID-19 Lockdown. Front. Public Health. 2021;8:594117. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.594117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roy C.M., Bollman E.B., Carson L.M., Northrop A.J., Jackson E.F., Moresky R.T. Assessing the indirect effects of COVID-19 on healthcare delivery, utilization and health outcomes: A scoping review. Eur. J. Public Health. 2021 doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moynihan R., Sanders S., A Michaleff Z.A., Scott A.M., Clark J., To E.J., Jones M., Kitchener E., Fox M., Johansson M., et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e045343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Scherbaum R., Kwon E.H., Richter D., Bartig D., Gold R., Krogias C., Tönges L. Clinical Profiles and Mortality of COVID-19 Inpatients with Parkinson’s Disease in Germany. Mov. Disord. 2021;36:1049–1057. doi: 10.1002/mds.28586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Richter D., Eyding J., Weber R., Bartig D., Grau A., Hacke W., Krogias C. Analysis of Nationwide Stroke Patient Care in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. Stroke. 2021;52:716–721. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Von Oertzen T.J., Macerollo A., Leone M.A., Beghi E., Crean M., Oztuk S., Bassetti C., Twardzik A., Bereczki D., Di Liberto G., et al. EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020;28:7–14. doi: 10.1111/ene.14521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hu C., Chen C., Dong X.-P. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:664965. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.664965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Consonni M., Telesca A., Bella E.D., Bersano E., Lauria G. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients’ and caregivers’ distress and loneliness during COVID-19 lockdown. J. Neurol. 2021;268:420–423. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10080-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cámara A., Compta Y., Pérez-Soriano A., Montagut N., Baixauli M., Maragall L., Ludeña E., de Reyes J.C.L., Peri-Cusi L., Fernández N., et al. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on people with multiple system atrophy participating in a therapeutic education program. Park. Relat. Disord. 2021;86:78–80. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ferini-Strambi L., Salsone M. COVID-19 and neurological disorders: Are neurodegenerative or neuroimmunological diseases more vulnerable? J. Neurol. 2021;268:409–419. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10070-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santos-García D., Oreiro M., Pérez P., Fanjul G., González J.M.P., Painceiras M.J.F., Bartolomé C.C., Aymerich L.V., Sancho C.G., Rodrigo M.D.M.C. Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Parkinson’s Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey of 568 Spanish Patients. Mov. Disord. 2020;35:1712–1716. doi: 10.1002/mds.28261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dubinsky R., Chen J., Lai S.-M. Trends in hospital utilization and outcome for patients with ALS: Analysis of a large U.S. cohort. Neurology. 2006;67:777–780. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000233849.47744.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.De Marchi F., Contaldi E., Magistrelli L., Cantello R., Comi C., Mazzini L. Telehealth in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Opportunities and Challenges for Patients and Physicians. Brain Sci. 2021;11:237. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hassan A., Mari Z., Gatto E.M., Cardozo A., Youn J., Okubadejo N., Bajwa J.A., Shalash A., Fujioka S., Aldaajani Z., et al. Global Survey on Telemedicine Utilization for Movement Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mov. Disord. 2020;35:1701–1711. doi: 10.1002/mds.28284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zullo S., Ingravallo F., Crespi V., Cascioli M., D’Alessandro R., Gasperini M., Lalli C., Lugaresi A., Marogna M., Mori M., et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with neurological disorders: An urgent need to enhance the health care system’s preparedness. Neurol. Sci. 2021;42:799–804. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04984-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang A.C., Kern F., Losada P.M., Agam M.R., Maat C.A., Schmartz G.P., Fehlmann T., Stein J.A., Schaum N., Lee D.P., et al. Dysregulation of brain and choroid plexus cell types in severe COVID-19. Nature. 2021;595:565–571. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03710-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alster P., Madetko N., Koziorowski D., Friedman A. Microglial Activation and Inflammation as a Factor in the Pathogenesis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) Front. Neurosci. 2020;14:893. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bouali-Benazzouz R., Benazzouz A. Covid-19 Infection and Parkinsonism: Is There a Link? Mov. Disord. 2021;36:1737–1743. doi: 10.1002/mds.28680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Merello M., Bhatia K.P., Obeso J.A. SARS-CoV-2 and the risk of Parkinson’s disease: Facts and fantasy. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:94–95. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30442-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gonzalez-Latapi P., Fearon C., Fasano A., Lang A.E. Parkinson’s Disease and COVID-19: Do We Need to Be More Patient? Mov. Disord. 2021;36:277. doi: 10.1002/mds.28469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.