Table 2.
The learning ability, ratio dependency and individual heterogeneity in quantitative discrimination of Asian freshwater turtles
| Estimate | SE | t | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment 1 Best-fit model: Success = Ratio + Day | ||||
| (Intercept) | 0.80 | 0.04 | 21.54 | < 0.0001 |
| Ratio | − 0.21 | 0.05 | − 4.47 | < 0.0001 |
| Day | 0.01 | 0.01 | 2.13 | 0.03 |
| Experiment 2 Best-fit model: Success = Subject + Ratio + Phase | ||||
| (Intercept) | 0.84 | 0.04 | 22.17 | < 0.0001 |
| Ratio | − 0.35 | 0.05 | − 6.92 | < 0.0001 |
| MS14 (vs. MS11) | 0.11 | 0.03 | 3.22 | 0.002 |
| MS16 (vs. MS11) | 0.11 | 0.03 | 3.22 | 0.002 |
| MS31 (vs. MS11) | 0.08 | 0.03 | 2.47 | 0.01 |
| MS33 (vs. MS11) | 0.09 | 0.03 | 2.85 | 0.005 |
| Phase II (vs. I) | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.68 | 0.09 |
| Phase III (vs. I) | 0.11 | 0.03 | 4.32 | < 0.0001 |
The quantitative discrimination of the turtles was measured as the daily success rate in the fixed numerosity tests (Experiment 1) and 5-day averaged success rate in the mixed numerosity tests (Experiment 2). “Ratio” is the ratio between the two quantities in a numerosity pair; “Day” is the ordered day sequence (i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) for a given numerosity pair in Experiment 1 indicating continuously accumulated trials; “Phase” is the ordered 5-day sequence (i.e. I, II, III) in Experiment 2 indicating progressively more difficult sets of numerosity pairs; “Subject” is the identity of the turtle. For full model selection details, see Additional file 1: Table S2 & Table S3