Table 4.
Cognitive decline according to the circadian rest-activity pattern
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Effect size (95% CI) | p value | Effect size (95% CI) | p value | |
Intradaily variability | ||||
Global | − 0.665 (− 1.190 to − 0.140) | 0.014 | − 0.715 (− 1.272 to − 0.157) | 0.013 |
Aβ42+ | − 0.522 (− 1.147 to 0.103) | 0.100 | − 0.717 (− 1.391 to − 0.042) | 0.038 |
Interdaily stability | ||||
Global | − 0.266 (− 0.818 to 0.286) | 0.341 | − 0.205 (− 0.817 to 0.407) | 0.507 |
Aβ42+ | − 0.108 (− 0.778 to 0.562) | 0.747 | 0.009 (− 0.690 to 0.708) | 0.979 |
Relative amplitude | ||||
Global | − 0.495 (− 1.025 to 0.036) | 0.067 | − 0.587 (− 1.192 to 0.019) | 0.057 |
Aβ42+ | − 0.658 (− 1.278 to − 0.038) | 0.038 | − 0.520 (− 1.202 to 0.163) | 0.132 |
Linear regression models were performed to assess the cognitive decline according to the circadian rest-activity pattern. Model 1, unadjusted analysis; model 2, adjusted for age, sex, T-tau/Aβ42 ratio, educational level, and season of the year
Aβ42 amyloid-beta protein, CI confidence interval, T-tau total-tau