Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;18(18):9706. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189706

Table 3.

Summaries of the models.

Antecedent Total Effect
[95% CI]		 Direct Effect
[95% CI]		 Test of Highest Order Unconditional Interaction: Bootstrapping 95% CI for the Moderation
Effect
Drive for thinness 0.130 ***
[0.0826; 0.1765]		 0.069 *
[0.0136; 0.1252]		 ΔR2 = 0.010
F(1, 315) = 6.810, p < 0.01		 [−0.0418; −0.0043]
Bulimia 0.089 **
[0.0239; 0.1530]		 0.039
[−0.0248; 0.1032]		 ΔR2 = 0.019
F(1, 315) = 10.252, p < 0.01		 [−0.0676; −0.00129]
Body dissatisfaction 0.095 **
[0.0350; 0.1533]		 −0.013
[−0.0881; 0.0699]		 ΔR2 = 0.016
F(1, 315) = 10.315, p < 0.01		 [−0.0641; −0.0138]

*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Drive For Thinness: the relationship between Drive for Thinness and Exercise Addiction, with Body Image Concerns as mediator and Self-Esteem as moderator; Bulimia: the relationship between Bulimia and Exercise Addiction, with Body Image Concerns as mediator and Self-Esteem as moderator; Body Dissatisfaction: the relationship between Body Dissatisfaction and Exercise Addiction, with Body Image Concerns as mediator and Self-Esteem as moderator.