Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 2;13(9):3089. doi: 10.3390/nu13093089

Table 4.

Weighted ORs (95%CI) for scores on the Consortium to CERAD test, Animal Fluency test, DSST across dietary VD intake, NHANES 2011–2014 (N = 2524).

Dietary VD Intake (μg/d) Dietary VD Intake (μg/d)
≤5.00 ≤20.75 >20.75 ≤5.00 >5.00
CREAD Test Case/Participants 265/798 268/888 185/838 265/798 453/1726
Crude 1.00 (Ref.) 1.02 (0.80–1.30) 0.69 (0.51–0.92) * 1.00 (Ref.) 0.84 (0.67–1.04)
Model 1 1.00 (Ref.) 0.96 (0.75–1.24) 0.70 (0.51–0.96) * 1.00 (Ref.) 0.82 (0.65–1.05)
Model 2 1.00 (Ref.) 0.97 (0.72–1.29) 0.83 (0.58–1.19) 1.00 (Ref.) 0.90 (0.69–1.17)
Animal Fluency Test Case/Participants 284/798 260/888 188/838 284/798 448/1726
Crude 1.00 (Ref.) 0.69 (0.49–0.97) * 0.43 (0.34–0.55) * 1.00 (Ref.) 0.55 (0.43–0.70) *
Model 1 1.00 (Ref.) 0.67 (0.48–0.93) * 0.41 (0.31–0.53) * 1.00 (Ref.) 0.53 (0.41–0.67) *
Model 2 1.00 (Ref.) 0.70 (0.43–1.13) 0.51 (0.36–0.72) * 1.00 (Ref.) 0.60 (0.41–0.89) *
Digit Symbol Test Case/Participants 277/798 247/888 133/838 277/798 380/1726
Crude 1.00 (Ref.) 0.82 (0.55–1.20) 0.36 (0.26–0.51) * 1.00 (Ref.) 0.56 (0.41–0.77) *
Model 1 1.00 (Ref.) 0.77 (0.53–1.14) 0.34 (0.25–0.46) * 1.00 (Ref.) 0.53 (0.39–0.73) *
Model 2 1.00 (Ref.) 0.72 (0.45–1.15) 0.45 (0.31–0.66) * 1.00 (Ref.) 0.59 (0.40–0.86) *

Binary logistic regression analyses were used to calculate weighted OR values. Reference (Ref.); model 1 adjusted for age and gender; model 2 adjusted for age and gender, race, educational level, marital status, income, body mass index (BMI), season of exam, physical activity level, drinking status, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, and stroke. Energy was adjusted, when we studied the intake of dietary VD. * p-value ≤ 0.05.