Table 4.
Name | F | Fa | Fg | Fh | UGTs Involved | Intestinal Metabolism? 2 | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canagliflozin | 0.65 | 1 3 | 0.75 4 | 0.86 | UGT1A9, UGT2B4 | No | Devineni et al. [94] |
Dapagliflozin | 0.78 | 1 3 | 0.90 | 0.86 | UGT1A9, UGT2B7 | Yes | Boulton et al. [97] |
Diclofenac | 0.54 | 1 3 | 0.64 | 0.85 | UGT2B7, UGT1A9, UGT1A6, UGT2B15 |
Yes | Varma et al. [90] |
Ertugliflozin | 1.05 | 1.11 | 1.08 | 0.88 | UGT1A9, UGT2B4, UGT2B7 |
Yes | Raje et al. [98] |
Gemfibrozil | 0.98 | 1 3 | 1.09 | 0.90 | UGT2B7 | Yes | Nishimuta et al. [20] |
Lorazepam | 0.93 | 1 3 | 0.97 | 0.96 | UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B15 |
Yes | Varma et al. [90] |
Raloxifene | 0.02 | 0.63 | 0.054 | 0.593 | UGT1A1, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, UGT1A10 5 |
Yes | Mizuma [12] |
Troglitazone | 0.45 | 1 3 | 0.56 | 0.80 | UGT1A1, UGT1A10 |
Yes | Nishimuta et al. [20] |
Lorazepam | 0.93 | 1 3 | 0.97 | 0.96 | UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B15 |
Yes | Varma et al. [90] |
Telmisartan | 0.43 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.64 | UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A9 |
Yes | Varma et al. [90] |
Oxazepam | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.99 | UGT1A9, UGT2B7, UGT2B15 |
Yes | Varma et al. [90] |
1 Numbers were either taken as reported or calculated using the approach of Kharasch et al. [89], reported Fa (or assumed 1 in the absence of a reported value), and a liver blood flow rate of 1.5 L/min [99]. F = bioavailability, Fa = fraction absorbed, FDp = fraction of dose passing into the portal vein, Fg = fraction of drug escaping first-pass intestinal metabolism, and Fh = hepatic availability. 2 Based on UGT expression in intestine from Basit et al. [8]. 3 Fa was assumed to be 1. In this case the Fg actually represented FDp (= Fa × Fg). 4 Canagliflozin Fg is most likely underestimated, since UGT1A9 and UGT2B4 are not expressed in the intestines. 5 For raloxifene, SULT1E1 contributes to metabolism, but intestinal metabolism is thought to be mainly due to glucuronidation by UGT1A1, 1A8, and 1A10 [100].