Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;13(9):2990. doi: 10.3390/nu13092990

Table 3.

Adjusted ORs* (95% CIs) of changes in ΔMS parameters according to the Δ of Recommended Food Consumption (a) and Discouraged Food Consumption (b) after 1 year of dietary intervention.

ΔMS Parameters (a)
ΔRFC/Day § Worsening No Change Low Improvement High Improvement
1st Tertile (<+1)
(n = 435)
1 1 1 1
2nd Tertile (1 to 5)
(n = 494)
0.84
(0.46–1.54)
1 0.94
(0.51–1.74)
1.26
(0.67–2.38)
3rd Tertile (>5)
(n = 369)
0.75
(0.39–1.43)
1 0.96
(0.50–1.84)
1.37
(0.70–2.67)
ΔMS Parameters (b)
ΔDFC/Day § Worsening No Change Low Improvement High Improvement
1st Tertile (<−1)
(n = 356)
1 1 1 1
2nd Tertile (−3 to –1)
(n = 478)
1.02
(0.55–1.88)
1 1.07
(0.58–2.02)
1.26
(0.66–2.40)
3rd Tertile(>−4)
(n = 464)
1.18
(0.61–2.27)
1 1.53
(0.79–2.96)
2.02
(1.03–3.98)

ΔRFC = delta value of Recommended Food Consumption expressed as daily frequencies of consumption; ΔDFC = delta value of Discouraged Food Consumption expressed as daily frequencies of consumption; ΔMS parameters = delta value of Metabolic Syndrome parameters; low improvement = reduction of 1 or 2 MS parameters; high improvement = reduction of 3 or more MS parameters. *ORs adjusted for center, age, BMI at baseline, education (years), hormonal treatment (yes/n o), years from BC diagnosis, and chemotherapy (yes/no) in the past. § Data were available for 1298 women (659 IG and 639 CG) due to missing values in same food items in the diaries.