Table 3.
ΔMS Parameters (a) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
ΔRFC/Day § | Worsening | No Change | Low Improvement | High Improvement |
1st Tertile (<+1)
(n = 435) |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
2nd Tertile (1 to 5)
(n = 494) |
0.84 (0.46–1.54) |
1 | 0.94 (0.51–1.74) |
1.26 (0.67–2.38) |
3rd Tertile (>5)
(n = 369) |
0.75 (0.39–1.43) |
1 | 0.96 (0.50–1.84) |
1.37 (0.70–2.67) |
ΔMS Parameters (b) | ||||
ΔDFC/Day § | Worsening | No Change | Low Improvement | High Improvement |
1st Tertile (<−1)
(n = 356) |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
2nd Tertile (−3 to –1)
(n = 478) |
1.02 (0.55–1.88) |
1 | 1.07 (0.58–2.02) |
1.26
(0.66–2.40) |
3rd Tertile(>−4)
(n = 464) |
1.18 (0.61–2.27) |
1 | 1.53 (0.79–2.96) |
2.02
(1.03–3.98) |
ΔRFC = delta value of Recommended Food Consumption expressed as daily frequencies of consumption; ΔDFC = delta value of Discouraged Food Consumption expressed as daily frequencies of consumption; ΔMS parameters = delta value of Metabolic Syndrome parameters; low improvement = reduction of 1 or 2 MS parameters; high improvement = reduction of 3 or more MS parameters. *ORs adjusted for center, age, BMI at baseline, education (years), hormonal treatment (yes/n o), years from BC diagnosis, and chemotherapy (yes/no) in the past. § Data were available for 1298 women (659 IG and 639 CG) due to missing values in same food items in the diaries.