Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 18;21(18):6264. doi: 10.3390/s21186264

Table 6.

Cardiovascular hemodynamics evaluations. Note: RMSE and MAE are in mmHg.

Studies Dataset Input Signal Cont. ABP Method Perf. Eval. Waveform SBP DBP
Tanveer et al. [6] 39 subjects, MIMIC, PhysioNet ECG + PPG No ANN + LSTM RMSE N/A 1.26 0.73
MAE N/A 0.93 0.52
R N/A 0.999 0.998
Wu et al. [7] 27 subjects ECG + PPG No RMSE N/A 3.404 3.289
Eom et al. [8] 15 subjects ECG + PPG + BCG No CNN + Bi-GRU + Attention MAE N/A 4.06 ± 4.04 3.33 ± 3.42
R2 N/A 0.52 0.49
Sideris et al. [9] 42 subjects, MIMIC, PhysioNet PPG Yes LSTM RMSE 6.04 ± 3.26 2.58 ± 1.23 1.98 ± 1.06
R 0.95 ± 0.05 N/A N/A
Sadrawi et al. [10] 18 Patients, NTUH, Taiwan PPG Yes GDCAE RMSE 3.46 3.41 2.14
MAE 2.33 2.54 1.48
R 0.984 0.981 0.979
Fan et al. [30] MIMIC II, PhysioNet ECG No BiLSTM + FCN RMSE N/A 12.3 6.88
MAE N/A 7.69 4.36
Slapničar et al. [45] 510 subjects, MIMIC III, PhysioNet PPG No Spectro
temporal ResNet
MAE N/A 9.43 6.88
Chowdhury et al. [46] 222 records, 126 subjects PPG No Gaussian process
regression
RMSE N/A 6.74 3.59
MAE N/A 3.02 1.74
R N/A 0.95 0.96
MSE N/A 45.49 12.89
Aguirre et al. [48] 1131 subjects, MIMIC, PhysioNet PPG Yes Seq2seq + Attention RMSE 8.67 15.96 7.4
MAE 7.39 12.08 5.56
R 0.98 N/A N/A
R2 N/A 0.39 0.41
Zadi et al. [47] 15 subjects PPG No ARMA RMSE N/A 7.21 5.12
Proposed 250 subjects, MGH/MF, PhysioNet ECG Yes MA-UDCAE RMSE 7.83 ± 0.06 8.99 ± 0.40 4.73 ± 0.13
MAE 4.95 ± 0.04 6.64 ± 0.35 3.21 ± 0.10
R 0.94 ± 0.00 0.89 ± 0.00 0.88 ± 0.01