Table 3.
Comparing the improvement ratio of the computed coefficients of the proposed algorithm and the existing algorithms.
| Krawtchouk Polynomial Parameter (p) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05, 0.95 |
0.1, 0.9 |
0.15, 0.85 |
0.2, 0.8 |
0.25, 0.75 |
0.3, 0.7 |
0.35, 0.65 |
0.4, 0.6 |
0.45, 0.55 |
0.5 | |
| Proposed | 9.22 | 12.48 | 14.73 | 16.41 | 17.71 | 18.70 | 19.43 | 19.94 | 20.24 | 20.34 |
| FRK | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 |
| RAN and RAX | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
| Improvement over FRK |
63.11 | 50.09 | 41.10 | 34.35 | 29.18 | 25.22 | 22.28 | 20.25 | 19.05 | 18.64 |
| Improvement over RAN and RAX |
81.55 | 75.05 | 70.55 | 67.18 | 64.59 | 62.61 | 61.14 | 60.12 | 59.52 | 59.32 |