Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 28;10(9):1794. doi: 10.3390/plants10091794

Table 1.

Survival and regrowth of Cultivar 1 explants from different freezing methods and incubation on various recovery media.

Cryopreservation Treatment Freezing Method Recovery Media Survival (%) Regrowth (%)
Control N/A HalfSMM 100 ± 0 90 ± 10 abc
N/A HalfSMM + GA3 100 ± 0 96.7 ± 3.3 a
N/A MSbasal 100 ± 0 95 ± 2.9 ab
N/A MSbasal + GA3 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 a
N/A SMM 100 ± 0 93.3 ± 3.3 ab
no LN2 Droplet Vitrification HalfSMM 76.7 ± 10.9 60 ± 12.6 cdef
Droplet Vitrification HalfSMM + GA3 66.7 ± 9.9 50 ± 13.4 def
Droplet Vitrification MSbasal 75 ± 5 35 ± 9.6 defg
Cryogenic vial MSbasal 80 ± 11.5 50 ± 17.3
Droplet Vitrification MSbasal + GA3 85 ± 9.6 75 ± 5 cdef
Cryogenic vial MSbasal + GA3 55 ± 9.6 55 ± 9.6
Droplet Vitrification SMM 85 ± 9.6 69.2 ± 15 abcd
Cryogenic vial SMM 80 ± 8.2 55 ± 12.6
LN2 Droplet Vitrification HalfSMM 33.3 ± 6.7 20 ± 0 fg
Droplet Vitrification HalfSMM + GA3 43.3 ± 6.1 23.3 ± 3.3 fg
Droplet Vitrification MSbasal 50 ± 5.8 30 ± 12.9 efg
Cryogenic vial MSbasal 55 ± 20.6 10 ± 10
Droplet Vitrification MSbasal + GA3 30 ± 5.8 15 ± 15 fg
Cryogenic vial MSbasal + GA3 30 ± 5.8 20 ± 8.2
Droplet Vitrification SMM 30 ± 11.3 3.3 ± 3.3 g
Cryogenic vial SMM 65 ± 5 15 ± 5

Survival and recovery were analyzed separately. Significant data is followed by different lower-case letters (p < 0.05). Significant differences were only found between cryopreservation treatments and media interactions when the droplet-vitrification method was used.