Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 26;11(9):2514. doi: 10.3390/ani11092514

Table 2.

Effects of Clostridium butyricum and aureomycin on growth performance of Pekin ducks 1.

Items 2 Group Con Group CB200 Group CB400 Group CB600 Group A150 SEM 3 p Value
1–21 d
ABW (kg) 1.17 1.17 1.26 1.17 1.07 0.02 0.062
ADG (g/d) 55.98 54.04 56.21 53.95 53.42 0.58 0.439
ADFI (g/d) 90.62 86.36 85.46 89.24 86.16 1.23 0.651
FCR 1.62 1.61 1.52 1.66 1.62 0.03 0.753
22–42 d
ABW (kg) 2.88 b 2.98 b 3.18 a 3.15 a 2.94 b 0.03 0.009
ADG (g/d) 155.09 b 157.19 b 162.75 a 155.43 b 155.31 b 0.92 0.028
ADFI (g/d) 246.96 236.39 244.32 244.85 243.82 2.08 0.584
FCR 1.59 a 1.50 b 1.50 b 1.58 a 1.57 a 0.01 0.029

1 Means with different superscript letters indicate that there are significant differences (p < 0.05) between any two groups in the same row. 2 ABW: average body weight, ADG: average daily gain, ADFI: average daily feed intake, FCR: feed conversion ratio, Group Con: the control group, Group A150: the aureomycin group. 3 Total SEM (N = 10).