Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):2279. doi: 10.3390/cells10092279

Table 2.

Results from phylogenetic generalized least-squares regression models explaining sperm behavior-based hook morphology.

Response Predictor t P R2 λ
Proportion of cells in
aggregate
Hook length −0.355 0.741 −0.21 1.000 (0.15, 1)
Hook width −8.351 0.014 0.97 1.000 (1, 0.01)
Head width 12.613 0.006
Total sperm cells −2.193 0.160
Hook area −2.300 0.105 0.51 1.000 (1, 0.11)
Head area 2.680 0.075
Number of cells in
aggregate
Hook length −0.575 0.596 −0.15 1.000 (0.18, 1)
Hook width −53.746 <0.001 1.00 1.000 (1, 0.01)
Head width 76.135 <0.001
Total sperm cells −12.787 <0.01
Hook area −1.852 0.161 0.31 1.000 (1, 0.10)
Head area 2.047 0.133
Sperm
curvilinear velocity
Hook length −1.670 0.170 0.26 1.000 (0.19, 1)
Hook area −2.809 0.107 0.56 1.000 (1, 0.09)
Head area 2.996 0.096
Total sperm cells 1.606 0.249
Hook width −4.607 0.019 0.84 1.000 (1, 0.01)
Head width 5.312 0.013

In all models, the branch length transformations for lambda, λ, were set using maximum likelihood (‘ML’), with lower and upper boundaries for the lambda estimation indicated within parentheses. Stepwise model simplification comparing models with and without total sperm cells (density) did not change any of these results (based on AIC values). Reported R2 values are adjusted values. Significant results at the p < 0.05 level are bolded, shaded areas signify different models.