Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 20;11(9):1726. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091726

Table 3.

Sub-analysis of EUS image quality and procedure time according to the operator’s experience with EUS procedures.

Evaluated Items Jelly-Filling Method
(n = 13)
Water-Filling Method
(n = 17)
p-Value
Expert, n 7 9
EUS image quality (points) 3 (3–4) 2 (2–3) 0.007
Procedure time (min) 5 (3–7) 4 (2–7) 0.329
Nonexpert, n 6 8
EUS image quality (points) 3 (3–4) 2 (1–3) 0.003
Procedure time (min) 8 (6–10) 4 (3–10) 0.036

Data are shown as the median (range).