Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 9;10(9):1435. doi: 10.3390/antiox10091435

Table 1.

Preprocessing and alignment results of all nine samples.

No. Group Sample ID Number of Reads Number of Good Reads (Percentage) Overall Alignment Rate
1 Wt mice VC1 21,622,102 20,743,123 (95.9%) 93.51%
2 VC4 23,804,636 22,983,122 (96.5%) 94.19%
3 VC6 25,529,616 24,586,395 (96.3%) 94.10%
4 ADM mice APP2 20,475,388 19,700,219 (96.2%) 93.03%
5 APP4 20,315,569 19,541,861 (96.1%) 91.00%
6 APP6 24,571,206 23,772,655 (96.7%) 93.35%
7 ADM mice+C3G C2 25,878,453 25,060,447 (96.8%) 91.31%
8 C4 25,609,508 24,844,294 (97.01%) 93.06%
9 C6 24,938,833 24,141,244 (96.8%) 92.61%
10 All samples Total: 212,745,311
Average: 23,638,367.8
Total: 205,373,360 Mean: 92.906%