Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;18(18):9730. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189730

Table 2.

Comparisons of water arsenic, muscle mass measures, and HOMA-IR of male and female subjects between the low- and high-arsenic exposure areas.

Variables Area Male Female
n Mean ± SD n Mean ± SD
Water As (µg/L) Low 41 2.48 ± 3.4 55 2.84 ± 4.76
High 189 157.25 ± 175.4 # 152 172.04 ± 167.69 #
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) Low 41 0.96 ± 0.16 55 0.86 ± 0.18
High 189 0.80 ± 0.18 # 151 0.77 ± 0.16 #
LBM (kg) Low 41 43.98 ± 6.96 55 36.58 ± 5.7
High 189 43.57 ± 6.15 152 33.13 ± 8.08 #
The subjects with the HOMA-IR measurement (n = 271) $
Water As (µg/L) Low 29 2.35 ± 3.35 39 2.88 ± 4.84
High 105 162.9 ± 156.77 # 98 186.74 ± 156.77 #
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) Low 29 0.99 ± 0.14 39 0.9 ± 0.15
High 105 0.78 ± 0.16 # 98 0.77 ± 0.13 #
LBM (kg) Low 29 43.42 ± 6.89 39 37.24 ± 5.93
High 105 42.84± 7.47 98 31.29 ± 8.09 #
HOMA-IR Low 29 0.81 ± 0.16 39 0.91 ± 0.37
High 105 1.57 ± 0.8 # 98 2.35 ± 1.88 #

# Significantly different (p < 0.001) from the low-exposure area by an independent sample t-test. $ The subjects with the HOMA-IR measurement participated also in the previous study in which HOMA-IR values were determined (Mondal et al., 2020).