Table 2.
No.
|
Task
|
Algorithms (model)
|
Sample size (type)
|
Evaluation index
|
Ref.
|
1 | Predicting clinical severity in AAH patients | Random forest; Convolutional neural network | 69 cases (CT texture features) | Accuracy: 82.4% of RFE-RF in the test set; Accuracy: 70% of CNN in the test set | [26] |
2 | Assessing significant liver fibrosis by multiparametric ultrasomics data | Adaboost; Random forest; SVM (multiparametric ultrasomics) | 144 HBV infected patients (multiparametric ultrasomics) | AUROC: 0.85 ± 0.01 of Adaboost, random forest, SVM in multiparametric ultrasomics including conventional ultrasomics, ORF and CEMF | [9] |
3 | Grading liver fibrosis | Inception-V3 network (transfer learning) | 466 patients (multimodal ultrasound) | AUCs of TL in GM + EM reached 0.950, 0.932, and 0.930, respectively, for grading S4, ≥ S3, and ≥ S2an | [28] |
4 | Predicting cirrhosis | LASSO (radiomics nomogram) | 144 cases of HBV patients (CT features and clinical factors) | AUROC: 0.915 in the training cohort, 0.872 in the validation cohort, overall correctly classified rate of 82.0% | [29] |
5 | Differentiating hepatic fibrosis’ grade | RFC (CTTA-based models); SVM (CTTA-based models) | 30 fibrosis patients (CT texture features) | Train AUC 0.95 in RFC (model 1); Test AUC 0.90 in RFC (model 1); Train AUC 0.88 in SVM (model 2); Test AUC 0.76 in SVM (model 2) | [30] |
6 | Assessing liver fibrosis severity | A prototype convolutional neural network | 558 cases (CT images) | AUCs were 0.82, 0.85, and 0.88 of VolL/VolS in diagnosing advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis in the whole study population | [31] |
7 | Staging liver fibrosis | Convolutional neural network | 634 fibrosis patients (MR images and MR/virus) | AUCs were 0.84, 0.84, and 0.85 of the model full for diagnosing F4, ≥ F3, and ≥ F2 in the test set, respectively | [34] |
8 | Assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B | Convolution neural network (DLRE) | 398 HBV patients (shear wave elastography) | AUCs of DLRE 1.00, 0.99, and 0.99 for classifying F4, ≥ F3, and ≥ F2 in the training set and 0.97, 0.98, and 0.85 in the validation set | [35] |
9 | Diagnosing FNH from HCC in the non-cirrhotic liver | LASSO (radiomics nomogram) | 156 patients (CT images and clinical factors) | Accuracy: 92.4% in the training set, 89.2% in the validation set | [38] |
10 | Diagnosing HCC | LASSO (radiomics signature) | 211 patients (MR images) | AUROC: 0.861 in the training set, 0.810 in the validation set | [39] |
11 | Preoperative prediction of HCC grade | LASSO (combined model with clinical factors and radiomics signature) | 170 HCC patients (MR images and clinical factors) | AUROC: 0.742, 0.786, and 0.800 based on T1WI images, T2WI images, and combined T1WI and T2WI images in the combined model | [41] |
12 | Predicting MVI risk in HBV-related HCC preoperatively | LASSO (radiomics nomogram) | 304 HCC patients (CT images and AFP) | AUROC: 0.846 in the training set, 0.844 in the validation set | [43] |
13 | Preoperative prediction of MVI in HCC patients | LASSO (combined model) | 157 HCC patients (CT images and clinical factors) | AUROC: 0.835 in the training dataset, 0.801 in the validation dataset | [44] |
14 | Predicting risk of HE complicated by hepatitis B related cirrhosis | LASSO (integrated model of radiomics and clinical features) | 304 cirrhosis patients (CT images and clinical factors) | Accuracy: 0.93 in the training cohort, 0.83 in the testing cohort | [45] |
15 | Predicting liver failure in cirrhotic patients with HCC after major hepatectomy | LASSO (integrated radiomics-based mode) | 101 HCC patients (MR images and clinical factors) | Accuracy: 0.802 in radiomics-based model | [47] |
AAH: Alcohol-associated hepatitis; CT: Computed tomography; RFE-RF: Recursive feature elimination using random forest; CNN: Convolutional neural network; SVM: Supporter vector machine; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; AUROC: Area under the receiver operating curve; ORF: Original radiofrequency; CEMF: Contrast-enhanced micro-flow; AUC: Area under curve; TL: Transfer learning; GM: Gray scale modality; EM: Elastogram modality; LASSO: Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; RFC: Random forest classifier; CTTA: Computed tomography texture analysis; VolL: Liver volume; VolS: Spleen volume; MR: Magnetic resonance; DLRE: Deep learning radiomics of shear wave elastography; FNH: Focal nodular hyperplasia; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; MVI: Microvascular invasion; AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein; HE: Hepatic encephalopathy.