Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 22;40:101127. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101127

Table 2.

Characteristics of studies included in the clinical review (N=18) and economic review (N=6)

First author and Location Population Study years Screening: strategy and tools TB case definition Sample/cohort*
Outcomes OR Details of costing studies and costs collected
Screen PCF
Clinical review – general population observational studies
Abdurrahman 2016
Abuja, Nigeria
Urban including slums 2010-2014 ACF: One off community health worker house-to-house symptom screen. Sputum collected for smear if symptoms. Smear + Adult ≥18 years 485 209 Smear grade
Symptom duration at diagnosis
den Boon 2008
Cape Town, South Africa
2 suburbs 2002-2005 Prevalence survey: sputum smear and culture for all collected at health centres. Smear or culture + Adult ≥15 years 27 473 Smear grade
Treatment outcomes
Shargie 2006
Hadiya zone,
Southern Ethiopia
Rural 1 district 2003 Prevalence survey: symptoms and/or on TB treatment. Sputum collected for smear if +. Smear + Adult ≥15 years 13 24 Symptom duration at treatment start
Gopi 2005
Tiiruvallur
South India
Rural and urban 1 sub-district 2001-2003 Prevalence survey: CXR and symptoms. Sputum collected for smear and culture if symptoms or abnormal CXR. Smear + Adult ≥15 years 243 1049 Pre-treatment loss to follow-up
Balasubramanian 2004; Tiiruvallur
South India
Rural and urban 1 sub-district 1998-2001 Prevalence survey: CXR and symptoms. Sputum collected for smear and culture if symptoms or abnormal CXR. Smear + Adult ≥15 years 231 833 Pre-treatment loss to follow-up
Santha 2003
Tiiruvallur
South India
Rural and urban 1 sub-district 1999-2000 Prevalence survey: CXR and symptoms. Sputum collected for smear and culture if symptoms or abnormal CXR. Smear + 96 330 Smear grade
Symptom duration at first contact with health services
Treatment outcomes
Harper 1996
East Nepal
Rural 8 districts 1990-1993 Likely ECF (unclear): outreach TB camps (diagnostic services) lasting 2-4 days with pre-camp publicity in areas away from health posts, with high TB burden or where community requested services. If symptomatic sputum collected at camps. 45 camps over 3 years. Smear + New TB 68 1306 Treatment outcomes
Cassels1982
East Nepal
Rural 1 district 1978-1980 ACF: one-off house-to-house symptom screen by vaccinators. Pots left for sputum collection if symptoms, with drop-off at designated centres within 20 minutes walking distance. Smear + 111 159 Treatment outcomes

Clinical review – general population cluster randomised trials
Shargie 2006
Hadiya Zone
Southern Ethiopia
Rural 2 districts 2003-2004 ECF: x1/month for 12 months IEC activities by community promoters encouraging those with symptoms to attend monthly diagnostic outreach clinic where sputum collected for smear. Smear + 159 221 Treatment outcomes

Clinical review – risk groups observational studies
Shewade 2019ʃ
18 districts in 7 states across India
Marginalised/vulnerable populationsŦ 2016-2017 ACF: one-off community volunteer house-to-house symptom screen. Referral for sputum smear if symptoms. Smear + Adult ≥15 years 275 297 Smear grade
Treatment outcomes
Shewade 2019ʃ
18 districts in 7 states across India
Marginalised/vulnerable populationsŦ 2016-2017 ACF: one-off community volunteer house-to-house symptom screen. Referral for sputum smear if symptoms. Smear + Adult ≥15 years 234 231 Duration of symptoms to 1) first contact with health services; 2) diagnosis
Time between diagnosis and treatment start
Time between symptoms and treatment start
Paiao 2016
Mato Grosso do Sul state, Brazil
Prisoners in 12 prisons 2013-2014 ACF: x2 symptom screen (at baseline and 1 year later). Sputum collected if symptoms. Culture + Adult ≥18 years 40 53 Smear positivity of culture confirmed TB patients
Story 2012
London, UK
Homeless people, drug users, asylum seekers, prisoners 2005-2010 ACF: mobile CXR screening programme. Screening in community settings where hard to reach people can be accessed (e.g. hostels, day centres, drug treatment services, prisons). Culture + Age >15 years 23 146 Smear positivity of culture confirmed TB patients
Verver 2001
Netherlands
Migrants 1993-1998 ACF: entry and every 6 months for 2 years CXR screening programme. Sputum for smear and culture if abnormal CXR. Smear or culture + Stay <30 months 454 368 Smear positivity of culture confirmed TB patients
Symptom duration at diagnosis
Treatment outcomes
Churchyard 2000
Free State, South Africa
Miners in 1 company 1993-1997 ACF: annual miniature CXR screening programme. Standard CXR and sputum for smear and culture if abnormal. Culture + Known HIV status and treatment outcome 1225 1011 Treatment outcomes
Capewell 1986
Edinburgh, UK
Hostel dwellers 1976-1982 ACF: x2/year miniature CXR screening programme, with monetary incentive. Referred to clinic if abnormal CXR. Culture + 42 26 Smear positivity of culture confirmed TB patients

Clinical review – risk groups cluster randomised trials
Jenum 2018
Palamaner in Andhra Pradesh, South India
Neonates receiving BCG by 72 hours of birth 2006-2010 ACF: x2/month for 2 years, home visits with screens for symptoms, TB exposure and failure to thrive. Referral with reminders to study medical ward for work up if +. n/a 2215 2167 Mortality – all cause
Fox 2018,
70 districts in 8 provinces of Vietnam
Household contacts in rural and urban areas 2010-2015 ACF: CXR and symptom screen at 0, 6, 12 and 24 months by National TB programme staff at district clinics. Sputum for smear and culture if symptoms or abnormal CXR n/a 10069 15638 Mortality – all cause

Economic review
Muniyandi 2020
India
General population (rural) 2016-2018 Prevalence survey: house-to house screening with symptoms and CXR. Sputum for smear and culture if symptoms or abnormal CXR. Adult ≥15 years with TB 110 226 Empirical; CA from patient perspective; Primary costing data; 2018 cost reference year
Diagnosis costs - Direct (medical and non-medical); Indirect – no input information
Treatment costs - Direct (medical and non-medical); indirect – no input information
Gurung 2019
Nepal
OPD attendees; social contacts of TB patients; general population (rural); 2018 ACF: Symptom screen in OPD; symptom screen social contacts; general population TB camp with community health worker house-to-house symptom screen 1-2 days before. Sputum for Xpert if symptoms. Adult ≥15 years with PTB between 2-12 weeks of treatment 50 49 Empirical; CA from patient perspective; Primary costing data; 2018 cost reference year
Pre-treatment costs:Direct medical – consultation, x-ray, lab tests, drugs, other; Direct non-medical – transport, food; Indirect – time loss, income loss
intensive phase treatment costs:Direct medical – consultation, x-ray, drugs; Direct non-medical – transport, food; Indirect – time loss, income loss
Hussain 2019
Pakistan
Private clinic attendees; general population (urban) 2011-2012 ACF: HCW incentives; symptom screen clinic attendees; ECF: TB IEC to general population. Sputum for smear/Xpert and CXR if symptoms. TB patients on treatment for at least 2 months 84 45 Decision modelling; CEA from provider and patient perspective; Primary and secondary costing data; 2012 cost reference year
Pre-diagnosis costs: Direct medical – consultation, tests, drugs; Direct non-medical – food and transport
Diagnosis costs:Direct medical – consultation, tests, drugs; Direct non-medical – food and transport
Treatment costs:Direct medical – consultation, tests, drugs; Direct non-medical – food and transport
Indirect costs – lost earnings
Shewade 2018
India
Marginalised and vulnerable populationsŦ 2016-2017 ACF: one-off community volunteer house-to house symptom screen. Referral for sputum smear if symptoms. Smear + Adult ≥15 years newly registered for treatment 234 231 Empirical; CA from patient perspective; Primary costing data; 2018 cost reference year
Diagnosis costs:Direct medical – consultation, drugs, tests; Direct non-medical – travel; Indirect – wages/income lost
Morishita 2016
Cambodia
Household and neighbourhood contacts of smear + TB patients 2014 ACF: all household and symptomatic neighbourhood contacts invited for CXR screening on a specific date. Sputum for Xpert if abnormal CXR or symptoms. New PTB with cured or completed treatment outcome 108 100 Empirical; CA from patient perspective; Primary costing data; 2014 cost reference year
Pre-treatment costs: Direct medical – administration, tests, x-ray, drugs, hospitalisation; Direct non-medical – transport, food, guardian, insurance reimbursement; Indirect – lost income from health seeking and sick leave
Treatment costs: Direct medical –hospitalisation; Direct non-medical – transport (DOTS, drug pick-up, follow-up visits), supplemental food, guardian/care giver, interest for borrowed money, insurance re-imbursement; Indirect – lost income (patient, guardian/care giver), reduced household activity, value lost from sold property
Sekandi 2015
Uganda
General population (urban) 2012 Prevalence survey: house-to-house symptom screen. Sputum collection if symptoms for smear/culture. Adult ≥15 years on at least 2 weeks of TB treatment 103 Decision modelling; CEA from societal perspective; Primary and secondary costing data; 2013 cost reference year
Diagnosis costs: Direct non-medical - transportation, food, care giver, child care/hired help; Indirect – patient and care giver time lost

number of people with TB unless otherwise indicated; PCF=passive case-finding; ACF=active case-finding; + = positive; CXR=chest radiograph; ECF=enhanced case finding; IEC=information, education and communication

community-promoters - individuals with previous experience in community outreach activities who are provided training about TB).

Ŧ

includes slums, tribal areas, scheduled caste communities, areas where occupational lung diseases is high, areas where individuals with high risk of acquiring TB reside including stone crushing/mining/weaving industry/unorganized labour (construction workers etc)/homeless, high HIV/AIDS burden areas, areas or communities with high TB incidence (including prisons) and among household contacts of sputum smear positive TB patients.

ʃ

Papers report different outcomes on the same study participants; BCG=Bacillus Calmette–Guérin; n/a=not applicable.

total number in screened and passive case-finding group; CA=cost analysis; OPD=outpatient department; PTB=pulmonary TB; x-ray=radiography; HCW=health care worker; CEA=cost effectiveness analysis; DOTS=Directly Observed Treatment, Short-course.