Table 3.
Training set (n = 75) | Test set (n = 52) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT (n = 34) |
PMA (n = 41) |
P1 | WT (n = 24) |
PMA (n = 28) |
P2 | |
Rad-score | −0.457 ± 0.632 | 0.757 ± 0.530 | <0.001 | −0.395 ± 0.685 | 0.750 ± 0.605 | <0.001 |
Nomo-score | −3.229 ± 2.927 | 2.866 ± 2.248 | <0.001 | −2.424 ± 2.627 | 2.900 ± 2.735 | <0.001 |
Nomo-score: nomogram score.; PMA: pleomorphic adenoma;Rad-score: radiomics score;WT: Warthin’s tumour.
Numerical data are presented as mean± standard deviation, categorical data as numbers (n).
P1: the P-value of comparison between WT and PMA in training set; P2: the P-value of comparison between WT and PMA in test set.