Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;2(2):100104. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100104

Table 2.

Summary of Overall Best Responses, Investigator-Assessed Per RECIST Version 1.1 (ITT Population)

Response Category Daratumumab Plus Atezolizumab (n = 46), n (%, 95% CI) Atezolizumab (n = 46), n (%, 95% CI) OR (95% CI)a
CR 0 (NE–NE) 0 (NE–NE)
PR 2 (4.3, 0.5–14.8) 6 (13.0, 4.9–26.3)
SD 22 (47.8, 32.9–63.1) 14 (30.4, 17.7–45.8)
PD 15 (32.6, 19.5–48.0) 21 (45.7, 30.9–61.0)
NE 7 (15.2, 6.3–28.9) 5 (10.9, 3.6–23.6)
Overall response (CR+PR) 2 (4.3, 0.5–14.8) 6 (13.0, 4.9–26.3) 0.30 (0.03–1.92)
CBR (CR+PR+SD) 24 (52.2, 36.9–67.1) 20 (43.5, 28.9–58.9) 1.41 (0.58–3.36)

CBR, clinical benefit rate; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; IC, immune cell; ITT, intent-to-treat; NE, not estimable; PD, progressive disease; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease; TC, tumor cell.

a

A Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common OR stratified by PD-L1 expression status (IC0 and TC0 versus others), histology (squamous versus nonsquamous), and the number of previous lines of therapy received (one or greater than one).