Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;1(3):100050. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100050

Table 1.

Summary of Studies With MKI for the Treatment of Patients With RET FusionPositive NSCLC

Author MKI N Detection Method (Tissue) ORR, % (n; 95% CI) PFS (Range) OS (Range) Grade 3–4 TRAE, %
Retrospective study
Gautschi et al.201716 Cabozantinib 21 FISH, PCR, NGS 37 (7; 16.3–61.5) 3.6 (1.3–7.0) 4.9 (1.9–14.3) Nr
Vandetanib 11 18 (2; 2.3–51.8) 2.9 (1.0–6.4) 10.2 (2.4–NR)
Sunitinib 10 22 (2; 2.8–60.0) 2.2 (0.7–5.0) 6.8 (1.1– NR)
Prospective studies—phase 2
Drilon et al.201617 Cabozantinib 26 FISH, NGS 28 (7; 12–49) 5.5 (3.8– 8.4) 9.9 (8.1–NR) 69
Lee et al.201731 Vandetanib 18 FISH, PCR, NGS 18 (3; Nr) 4.5 11.6 28
Yoh et al.201732 Vandetanib 19 FISH, PCR 47 (9; 28–77) 4.7 (2.8– 8.5) 11.1 (9.4–NR) >58
Hida et al.201934 Lenvatinib 25 NGS 16 (4; 4.5–36.1) 7.3 (3.6– 10.2) NR 92
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES – Phase 1b
Drilon et al.201936 RXDX-105 31 NGS 19 (6; 8–38) Nr Nr Nr

CI, confidence interval; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; MKI, multikinase inhibitor; NGS, next-generation sequencing; NR, not reached; Nr, not reported; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PFS, progression-free survival; TRAE, treatment-related adverse event.