Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;1(2):100018. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100018

Table 2.

Association Between Histologic Classification and Radiologic Parameters

Radiologic Features Histologic Classification of Adenocarcinoma
AIS MIA IA p Value
Location
 RUL 0 2 13 0.19
 RML 1 0 1
 RLL 0 1 5
 RUL + RML + RLL 0 0 1
 RUL + RML 0 0 1
 LUL 1 0 11
 LLL 0 0 10
Classification
 GGO 1 0 1 0.020
 GGN 0 0 8
 Solid 1 3 33
Margins of the nodule(s)
 Smooth 1 0 1 0.018
 Spiculated 0 1 30
 Lobulated 1 2 9
 No margins 0 0 2
Shape of the nodule(s)
 Round 0 0 2 0.18
 Polygonal 2 0 8
 Irregular 0 3 30
 No margins 0 0 2
Largest size of the nodule(s) (mm)
 Median (range) 36 (28–44) 16 (8–22) 28 (4–250) 0.28
Largest size solid component (mm)
 Median (range) 44 (44–44) 16 (8–22) 23 (4–250) 0.36
Pleural retraction
 Yes 1 2 23 0.51
 No 1 0 14
Air bronchogram
 Yes 1 0 6 0.37
 No 1 2 31
Cavities, bulla
 Yes 1 0 6 0.37
 No 1 2 31
Lymph-node involvement
 Yes 0 0 11 0.43
 No 2 2 25
Visual FDG uptakea
 No uptake 1 0 0 <0.001
 Faint 0 0 8
 Moderate 1 1 3
 Intense 0 1 27

RUL, right upper lobe; RML, right middle lobe; RLL, right lower lobe; LUL, left upper lobe; LLL, left lower lobe; GGO, ground-glass opacity; GGN, ground-glass nodule; SN, solid nodule; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; MIA, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma; IA, invasive adenocarcinoma; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose.

a

FDG uptake was addressed as a semiquantitative evaluation.