Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 3;2:100029. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2019.100029

Table 2.

Mixed-model ANOVA analyses of questionnaire responses.

Questionnaires Placebo
Probiotic
F-within
F-between
F-interaction
p-value
T1 T2 T1 T2
PSS 19.7(6.5) 18.0(6.9) 20.4(5.9) 18.0(5.7) F(1,77) ​= ​24.20 p ​< ​0.05
F(1,77) ​= ​0.060 p ​= ​0.81
F(1,77) ​= ​0.810 p ​= ​0.37
CES-D 18.6(9.9) 16.3(10.9) 19.6(9.8) 16.2(9.4) F(1,77) ​= ​15.31 p ​< ​0.05
F(1,77) ​= ​0.550 p ​= ​0.46
F(1,77) ​= ​0.053 p ​= ​0.82
STAI (Y1) 41.0(11.4) 40.1(11.4) 41.3(12.2) 39.5(11.0) F(1,77) ​= ​2.016 p ​= ​0.16
F(1,77) ​= ​0.002 p ​= ​0.96
F(1,77) ​= ​0.234 p ​= ​0.63
STAI (Y2) 44.0(12.1) 43.2(12.3) 46.7(11.4) 44.3(11.0) F(1,77) ​= ​4.728 p ​< ​0.05
F(1,77) ​= ​0.562 p ​= ​0.46
F(1,77) ​= ​1.137 p ​= ​0.29

T1, pre-experimental scores; T2, post-experimental scores; PSS, Perceived Stress Scale; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression scale; STAI (Y1/2), Y-1/2 forms of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.