. 2021 Sep 26;14:495. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04997-8

Table 2.

Bioassay responses and resistance levels of transgenic Drosophila lines against deltamethrin (technical), K-Othrine, and transfluthrin EC, in adult contact bioassays

Genotype	Deltamethrin^a		K-Othrine	Equivalent^d deltamethrin		Transfluthrin EC
Genotype	LD50^b	RR^c	LC50^b	LC50^b	RR^c	LC50^b	RR^c
HR-J28	6.49 (4.051–6.60)	1	10.524 (9.15–12.44)	2.631 (2.29–3.11)	1	0.35 (0.33–0.38)	1
L1014F;HR	39.5 (23.1–53.9)	6.09	331.9 (266.46–40.85)	82.975 (66.61–103.21)	31.54	1.666 (1.336–2.01)	4.76
V1016G;HR-9J28	61.5 (47.5–78.5)	9.48	280.44 (238.46–335.49)	70.711 (59.61–83.87)	26.88	1.98 (1.43–2.25)	5.6
L1014F;HR-6BQ23	233.1 (171.7–333.8)	35.9	1426.224 (1006.24–1934.32)	356.556 (251.56–483.58)	135.5	0.48 (0.11–0.86)	1.36

^aData from Samantsidis et al. [12]: topical application of technical deltamethrin, LD50 (95% confidence interval), ng/fly

^bLethal concentration (95% confidence interval) in mg/vial

^cResistance ratio (RR), compared to HR-J28

^dEquivalent stands for the respective amount of active insecticide ingredient in each pesticide formulation