Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 25;10(5):275–287. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v10.i5.275

Table 1.

JBI bias assessment for observational studies

Questions (Yes/No/Unclear/Not applicable)
Smith et al [19], 2021
Zhou et al [16], 2020
Wang et al [20], 2020
Fadini et al [17], 2020
Wang et al [21], 2020
Li et al[14], 2020
Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Were confounding factors identified? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? Yes No No Yes No Yes
Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Was the follow-up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? No No No No Yes Yes
Was follow-up complete, and if not, were the reasons for loss to follow-up described and explored? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Were strategies to address incomplete follow-up utilized? Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes
Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Overall appraisal Include Include Include Include Include Include