Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 5;10(16):e021459. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021459

Table 5.

Comparison of Current Findings From GWTG‐HF With PIONEER‐HF

Patient Characteristics GWTG‐HF PIONEER‐HF3
9408 Patients From 301 US Sites 887 Patients From 129 US Sites
Sacubitril/Valsartan (n=1551) ACEI/ARB (n=7857) Sacubitril/Valsartan (n=440) ACEI (n=441)
Age 78 (72–84) 78 (71–85) 61 (51–71) 63 (54–72)
Women 630 (40.6) 3187 (40.6) 113 (25.7) 133 (30.2)
Black race 187 (12.2) 968 (12.3) 158 (35.9) 158 (35.8)
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 118 (106–130) 118 (106–131) 118 (110–133) 118 (109–132)
Heart rate, beats/min 75 (68–84) 75 (67–84) 81 (72–92) 80 (72–91)
Creatinine, mg/dL 1.2 (1.0–1.5) 1.2 (0.9–1.5) 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
Prior PCI 400 (26.1) 1953 (24.8) 2 (0.5) 6 (1.4)
Prior CABG 427 (27.9) 2070 (26.3) 18 (4.1) 17 (3.9)
Diabetes mellitus 650 (42.5) 3267 (41.5) 79 (18.0) 89 (20.2)
Atrial fibrillation 638 (41.7) 3365 (42.8) 147 (33.4) 165 (37.4)
Relative Risk of Clinical Outcomes—Sacubitril/Valsartan vs RASi—HR (95% CI)
End Point 12‐mo Follow‐Up 8‐wk Follow‐Up
All‐cause mortality 0.82 (0.72–0.94)* 0.66 (0.30–1.48)
HF hospitalization 1.04 (0.91–1.18)* 0.56 (0.37–0.84)

Data presented as n (%) or median (25th–75th percentile). ACEI indicates angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; GWTG‐HF, Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure registry; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PIONEER‐HF, Comparison of Sacubitril–Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT‐proBNP [N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide] in Patients Stabilized from an Acute Heart Failure Episode; and RASi, renin‐angiotensin system inhibitor.

*

Reflects full model incorporating inverse probability of treatment weighting for 25 demographic and clinical variables and 6 index hospital variables, as well as adjustment for discharge prescription for beta‐blocker and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy.