Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;11(9):e047957. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047957

Table 2.

Association between NLR and pCR for different subgroups

Subgroup analysis of PCR No of studies No of patients OR (95% CI) P (z-test) Heterogeneity P for subgroup difference
I2 Ph(Q)
Total 17 5504 1.620 (1.209 to 2.169) 0.001 66.00% 0.000
Year 0.571
 ≤2018 8 1193 2.144 (0.949 to 4.844) 0.067 78.00% 0.000
 >2018 9 4311 1.452 (1.133 to 1.860) 0.003 46.30% 0.061
Country 0.78
 Asian 13 3358 1.726 (1.167 to 2.553) 0.006 71.00% 0.000
 Non-Asian 4 2146 1.189 (0.974 to 1.451) 0.089 0.00% 0.435
Sample size 0.04
 ≤200 9 1090 2.783 (1.484 to 5.221) 0.001 55.70% 0.021
 >200 8 4414 1.254 (0.970 to 1.621) 0.084 56.20% 0.025
Cut-off value 0.72
 ≤2.3 9 2947 1.387 (0.930 to 2.069) 0.108 69.30% 0.001
 >2.3 7 2077 2.334 (1.345 to 4.051) 0.003 59.50% 0.022
 NR 1 480 1.358 (0.787 to 2.343) 0.271
Subtype 0.256
 ALL 10 3402 1.491 (1.040 to 2.137) 0.030 65.20% 0.003
 HR+/HER2− 2+(1) 1275 1.320 (0.646 to 2.697) 0.446 49.00% 0.141
 TNBC 4+(1) 827 2.905 (1.350 to 6.249) 0.006 69.10% 0.003
 HER2-positive 0 0

Bold values mean p<0.05.

HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; NR, not reported; pCR, pathological complete response; Ph(Q), p values of Q test for heterogeneity test; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.