Table 3.
Resources
| Agency | Type of resource and links |
|---|---|
| ORWH | Consideration of SABV in NIH-funded research |
| https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-102.html | |
| Enhancing reproducibility through rigor and transparency | |
| https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-103.html | |
| Implementing rigor and transparency in NIH and AHRQ research grant applications | |
| https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-16-011.html | |
| Implementing new rigor and transparency polices in review—lessons learned | |
| https://www.csr.nih.gov/CSRPRP/2016/09/implementing-new-rigor-and-transparency-policies-in-review-lessons-learned/ | |
| Updates to NIH and AHRQ RPPRs to address rigor and transparency | |
| https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-16-031.html | |
| FAQs on consideration of relevant biological variables, such as sex | |
| https://grants.nih.gov/reproducibility/faqs.htm#IV | |
| FAQs about SABV policy | |
| https://orwh.od.nih.gov/research/sex-gender/nih-policy/faq/ | |
| https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/tag/sabv/ | |
| Valid analysis guidance | |
| https://grants.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Valid%20analysis%20CTgov%20guidance%20final_508c.pdf | |
| Online courses for continuing medical education credit | |
| https://orwh.od.nih.gov/career-development-education/e-learning | |
| Guidelines for researchers | |
| https://orwh.od.nih.gov/resources/pdf/NOT-OD-15-102_Guidance.pdf | |
| Guidelines for reviewers | |
| https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/guidelines_general/SABV_Decision_Tree_for_Reviewers.pdf | |
| RFI: Consideration of sex as a biological variable in biomedical research | |
| https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-14-128.html | |
| Publications | |
| National Research Council. (2001) Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? National Academies Press, Washington, DC. | |
| https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10028/exploring-the-biological-contributions-to-human-health-does-sex-matter | |
| Clayton JA. Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine. | |
| http://www.fasebj.org/content/30/2/519.full.pdf+html | |
| Clayton JA, Collins FS. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. | |
| http://www.nature.com/news/policy-nih-to-balance-sex-in-cell-and-animal-studies-1.15195 | |
| Trans-NIH Strategic Plan for Women’s Health Research | |
| https://orwh.od.nih.gov/about/trans-nih-strategic-plan-womens-health-research | |
| Videos on methods and techniques | |
| https://orwh.od.nih.gov/research/sex-gender/methods-and-techniques/ | |
| SABV workshop | |
| https://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?Live=26050&bhcp=1 | |
| IGH | Online interactive courses on integrating sex and gender in biomedical research, primary data collection in humans, and secondary data analysis |
| http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49347.html | |
| Instructions for peer review assessment | |
| http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/50837.html | |
| Knowledge translation | |
| http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/40948.html | |
| SGBA action plan and resources | |
| http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/50837.html | |
| Fact vs fiction information sheets on sex and gender | |
| http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49629.html | |
| Casebook: What a difference sex and gender make | |
| http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/44082.html | |
| Publications: | |
| Haverfield J, Tannenbaum C. (2021) A 10-year longitudinal evaluation of science policy interventions to promote sex and gender in health research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00741-x | |
| Tannenbaum C, Ellis RP, Eyssel F, et al. (2019) Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. | |
| https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1657-6 | |
| Tannenbaum C, van Hoof K. (2018) Effectiveness of online learning to integrate sex and gender in grant proposals. | |
| https://bsd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13293-018-0197-3 | |
| Day S, Mason R, Tannenbaum C, Rochon PA. (2017) Essential metrics for assessing sex & gender integration in health research proposals involving human participants. | |
| https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182812 | |
| Tannenbaum C, Day D; Matera Alliance. (2017) Age and sex in drug development and testing | |
| https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104366181730275X?via%3Dihub | |
| Clayton JA, Tannenbaum C. (2016) Reporting sex, gender, or both in clinical research? | |
| https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2577142 | |
| Tannenbaum C, Greaves L, Graham ID. (2016) Why sex and gender matter in implementation research. | |
| https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-016-0247-7 | |
| Tannenbaum C, et al. (2016). Evaluating sex as a biological variable in preclinical research: the devil in the details. | |
| https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750169/ | |
| Videos | |
| Peer-review assessment criteria | |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hlceez1Dx5E&index=1&list=PL6hlpNDF2-NUIAX5AfUzs72esOD28bPQJ | |
| Learning about sex and gender | |
| http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/50003.html | |
| Shaping science for a healthier world | |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCiSytha55U | |
| GenPort—online community of practitioners for sharing knowledge and inspiring collaboration | |
| www.genderportal.eu | |
| Gender toolkit | |
| http://www.yellowwindow.com/genderinresearch/ | |
| Responsible research and innovation tools | |
| http://www.rri-tools.eu/ | |
| Cost Action Gender STE | |
| http://www.cost.eu/about_cost/strategy/targeted_networks/genderste | |
| EC | Gendered Innovations publication, Gendered innovations: how gender analysis contributes to research (2013) |
| https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/gendered_innovations.pdf | |
| Gendered Innovations 2 publication, Gendered Innovations 2: how inclusive analysis contributes to research and innovation (2020) | |
| https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/strategy_on_research_and_innovation/documents/ki0320108enn_final.pdf | |
| Gendered Innovations website (2011-) with general and specific methods for sex, gender, and intersectional analysis, and case studies in various research areas | |
| http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/ | |
| Gender-NET ERA-NET | |
| http://www.gender-net.eu/?lang=en | |
| Policy documents | |
| http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/index.cfm?pg=policy&lib=gender | |
| GenPort—online community of practitioners for sharing knowledge and inspiring collaboration | |
| www.genderportal.eu | |
| Gender toolkit | |
| http://www.yellowwindow.com/genderinresearch/ | |
| Responsible research and innovation tools | |
| http://www.rri-tools.eu/ | |
| Cost Action GenderSTE | |
| http://www.cost.eu/about_cost/strategy/targeted_networks/genderste |
Abbreviations: AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; FAQ, frequently asked questions; IGH, Institute of Gender Health; NIH, US National Institutes of Health; ORWH, Office of Research on Women’s Health; RFI, request for information; RPPR, Research Performance Progress Reports; SABV, sex as a biological variable;