Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;31(3):713–722. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03002-0

Table 1.

Participant characteristics by perceived restrictiveness of social distancing and quality of life (QoL) categories

QoL pa Perceived restrictiveness of social distancing pa
Constant high (n = 104) Low/moderate (n = 581) Yes (n = 432) No (n = 253)
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Perceived restrictiveness of social distancing recommendations, high 60 (58) 372 (64) .218
QoL, constant high 327 (86) 209 (82) .218
Living arrangement, alone 37 (36) 226 (39) .521 170 (39) 93 (37) .501
Loneliness, no 86 (83) 317 (55)  < .001 236 (55) 167 (66) .004
Age
 75 years 63 (61) 281 (48) .027 226 (52) 118 (47) .337
 80 years 31 (30) 190 (33) 135 (31) 86 (34)
 85 years 10 (10) 110 (19) 71 (16) 49 (19)
Sex, women 71 (53) 324 (59) 276 (64) 119 (47)  < .001
Mean (sd) Mean (sd) pb Mean (sd) Mean (sd) pb
Stress-coping ability 35.0 (4.1) 31.0 (4.9)  < .001 31.1 (4.9) 32.0 (5.1) .022
Walking speed, m/s 1.9 (0.4) 1.8 (0.4)  < .001 1.8 (0.4) 1.8 (0.4) .067
Chronic conditions, number 2.7 (1.8) 3.4 (2.0)  < .001 3.5 (2.0) 3.1 (1.9) .013
MMSE 28.0 (1.8) 27.5 (2.1) .016 27.8 (2.0) 27.3 (2.3) .009

Bold typeface indicates statistically significant at the significance level of .05

The category no perceived restrictiveness of social distancing recommendation included the responses “not at all” and “little” and the category yes perceived restrictiveness included the responses “somewhat”, “much” and “very much”; the criterion for membership of the category constant high QoL was a QoL score in the highest quartile at baseline (≥ 59 points) and maintaining it at the same level during social distancing. Participants not meeting this criterion were considered to have low/moderate QoL; the category no loneliness included the response option “very rarely/never” and the category loneliness at least sometimes the response options from “almost always” to “rarely”

aTested with chi-square test

bTested with t test