Table 2.

Odds ratios for constant high (n = 104) vs. low/moderate (n = 581) QoL and perceived (n = 432) vs. no perceived (n = 253) restrictiveness of social distancing

	QoLa	Perceived restrictiveness of social distancing recommendationsa
	Constant high (n = 104)	Yes (n = 432)
	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)
Walking speed, per 0.1 m/s	1.08 (1.01–1.15)	0.98 (0.95–1.02)
Stress-coping ability, per 1 point	1.21 (1.14–1.28)	0.98 (0.95–1.02)
Loneliness, ‘no’ vs. ‘yes, at least sometimes’	2.67 (1.48–4.63)	0.65 (0.45–0.94)
Living arrangement, ‘alone’ vs. ‘with someone’	1.34 (0.78–2.30)	0.79 (0.54–1.15)

Bold typeface indicates statistically significant at the significance level of .05

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

^aAnalyzed with logistic regression analysis, constant high vs. low/moderate QoL and yes vs. no perceived restrictiveness of social distancing, adjusted for age, sex, MMSE, education and chronic conditions