Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;25(12):6517–6531. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04157-3

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies and their interventions

Treatment modality Publication Study design Number of patients Number of impressions Type of restoration Scanner system Area of IOS Conventional impression material Outcomes measured
Tooth-supported Gjelvold et al. 2016 RCT 48 24 IOS/24 CI SC and FDPs Trios Standard P-12 (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) Complete-arch scan (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) Time and PROMs
Benic et al. 2016 RCT 10 30 IOS/10 CI SC Lava (Lava C.O.S.; 3M ESPE), iTero (Align Technology Inc), and CEREC (CEREC Bluecam; Sirona Dental Systems) Quadrant scan Polyvinyl siloxane (A-silicone) light and regular body materials (President; Coltène/Whaledent AG) Time and PROMs
Ahrberg et al. 2016 RCT 25 25 IOS/25 CI SC and FDPs Lava C.O.S. Quadrant and complete-arch scan (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) Time
Sakornwimon and Leevailoj, 2017 RCT 16 8 IOS/8 CI SC 3M True Definition scanner Quadrant scan PVS (Express XT Putty Soft + Express XT Light Body; 3M ESPE) + alginate (antagonist) PROMs
Haddadi et al. 2018 RCT 19 19 IOS/19 CI SC Trios 3 (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) Quadrant scan PVS (Extrude, Kerr) + alginate (antagonist) Time and PROMs
Koulivand et al. 2020 Prospective 25 25 IOS/25 CI SC Trios (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) Quadrant scan Heavy-body putty followed by light body PVS (X-light silicone: A-silicone, Panasil, Kettenbach GmbH & Co. KG, Germany). Time
Sailer et al. 2019 RCT 10 30 IOS/10 CI FDPs Lava C.O.S.; 3M, iTero; Align Technology Inc, CEREC Bluecam; Dentsply Sirona. Complete-arch scan Permadyne; 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) Time and PROMs
Implant-supported Wismeijer et al. 2014 Prospective 30 30 IOS/30 CI SC and FDPs iTero scanner, Align Tech Inc Quadrant scan (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) + alginate (Cavex) Time and PROMs
Schepke et al. 2015 Prospective 48 48 IOS/48 CI SC CEREC Omnicam; Dentsply Sirona Complete-arch scan (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) Time and PROMs
Gherlone et al. 2016 Prospective 25 15 IOS/15 CI IFCDs Trios (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) Complete-arch scan Permadyne; 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) Time
Joda and Bragger 2016 RCT 20 20 IOS/20 CI SC iTero; Align Technology Inc Quadrant scan (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) Time and PROMs
Di Fiore et al. 2018 Prospective 10 10 IOS/10 CI SC CEREC Omnicam; Dentsply Sirona Quadrant scan (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) Time
Pan et al. 2019 Prospective 20* 20 IOS/20 CI SC Trios-1 (3Shape Standard P-11 A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) Complete-arch scan (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE GmbH, Neuss, Germany) Time
Guo et al. 2019 Prospective 20 40 IOS/20 CI SC Trios-1 (3Shape Standard P-11 A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) Complete-arch scan (Impregum Penta; 3M ESPE GmbH, Neuss, Germany) PROMs
Delize et al. 2019 Prospective 31 31 IOS/31 CI SC Trios 2 (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) Quadrant scan Heavy‐ and light‐viscosity silicone (Imprint 4® impression material, 3M) PROMs
Cappare et al. 2019 RCT 50 25 IOS/25 CI IFCDs Carestream CS 3600 (Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA). Complete-arch scan Gypsum (Éclair Class II, Ultima, Angers, France) Time
Lee et al. 2021 RCT 30 30 IOS/30 CI SC IOS (iTero Element; Align Technology Inc) Quadrant scan (PVS) impression material (Aquasil Ultra Monophase Light Viscosity; Dentsply Sirona) Time and PROMs

Legend: RCT, randomized clinical trial; IOS, intraoral scanning; CI, conventional impression; SC, single crown; FDP, fixed dental prosthesis; IFCDs, implant-fixed complete dentures; PROMs, patient-reported outcome measures

*Original study included 40 patients; however, only 20 patients were analyzed separately as the other 20 patients (bone-level implants) were included in Guo et al. 2019 study