Table 4.
Hierarchical regression analysis predicting writing improvement with self- and peer feedback (N = 116).
Step 1 (β) | Step 2 (β) | |
---|---|---|
Model 1 | ||
Feedback amount_SF | −0.22* | −0.24* |
Feedback types_SF | 0.22* | 0.21* |
Amount of SF implemented | 0.29** | 0.18+ |
Feedback amount_PF | −0.24* | |
Feedback types_PF | 0.18+ | |
Amount of PF implemented | 0.32** | |
R 2 | 0.152*** | 0.252*** |
ΔR2 | 0.101** | |
Model 2 | ||
Feedback amount_PF | −0.28** | −0.24* |
Feedback types_PF | 0.18+ | 0.18+ |
Amount of PF implemented | 0.40*** | 0.32** |
Feedback amount_SF | −0.24* | |
Feedback types_SF | 0.21* | |
Amount of SF implemented | 0.18+ | |
R 2 | 0.159*** | 0.252*** |
ΔR2 | 0.093** |
p < 0.06;
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.