Table 4.
Hierarchical regression analysis predicting writing improvement with self- and peer feedback (N = 116).
| Step 1 (β) | Step 2 (β) | |
|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | ||
| Feedback amount_SF | −0.22* | −0.24* |
| Feedback types_SF | 0.22* | 0.21* |
| Amount of SF implemented | 0.29** | 0.18+ |
| Feedback amount_PF | −0.24* | |
| Feedback types_PF | 0.18+ | |
| Amount of PF implemented | 0.32** | |
| R 2 | 0.152*** | 0.252*** |
| ΔR2 | 0.101** | |
| Model 2 | ||
| Feedback amount_PF | −0.28** | −0.24* |
| Feedback types_PF | 0.18+ | 0.18+ |
| Amount of PF implemented | 0.40*** | 0.32** |
| Feedback amount_SF | −0.24* | |
| Feedback types_SF | 0.21* | |
| Amount of SF implemented | 0.18+ | |
| R 2 | 0.159*** | 0.252*** |
| ΔR2 | 0.093** |
p < 0.06;
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.