TABLE 3.
Quality appraisal summary of eight included qualitative studies
| CASP criteria | Met the criteria? (yes, cannot tell, no) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banta‐Wright et al., 2015 | Barbas & Kelleher, 2004 | Barros da Silva et al., 2019 | Moe et al., 1998 | Duhn & Burke, 1998 | Lambert & Watters, 1998 | Lewis & Kritzinger, 2004 | Ryan et al., 2013 | |
| Q1: Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Q2: Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Q3: Was the research design appropriate to the aims of the research? | Y | ? | Y | Y | Y | ? | Y | Y |
| Q4: Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Q5: Were the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? | Y | Y | Y | ? | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Q6: Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately addressed? | Y | N | ? | ? | Y | N | N | Y |
| Q7: Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | N |
| Q8: Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | Y | ? | Y | N | Y | ? | Y | Y |
| Q9: Is there a clear statement of findings? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Q10: How valuable is the research? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |