Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;11:19084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98669-3

Table 2.

Myalgia characteristics in the treosulfan cohort and busulfan cohort.

Characteristic Treosulfan (n = 34) Busulfan (n = 3)
Age at SCT (years, median (range)) 12.2 (1.8–18.2) 11.5 (10.9–17.2)
Sex (n: M/F) 20/14 67/33
Diagnosis for HSCT
Beta-thalassemia (%) 15 (44)
Sickle cell disease (%) 13 (38)
Inborn errors of immunity (%) 1 (3)
Hematological malignancy (%) 4 (12) 3 (100)
Bone marrow failure (%) 1 (3)
Conditioning
Treo-Flu-Thiotepa (%) 28 (82)
Treo-Flu (%) 5 (15)
Treo-Other (%) 1 (3)
Bu-Flu-Clo (%) 3 (100)
Location of pain
Leg (%) 33 (97) 3 (100)
Arm (%) 28 (82) 3 (100)
Knee / ankle (%) 16 (47)
Elbow (%) 9 (26)
Neck (%) 9 (26)
Back (%) 8 (24)
Shoulder (%) 7 (21)
Foot (%) 15 (44)
Hand (%) 8 (24)
Duration of pain
 ≤ 7 days (%) 4 (12) 1 (33)
8–14 days (%) 7 (20) 2 (67)
15–21 days (%) 8 (24)
 > 21 days (%) 15 (44)
Medical intervention
Paracetamol/acetaminophen 34 (100) 3 (100)
NSAIDs 4 (12) 1 (33)
Tramadol 32 (94) 2 (67)
Opiate, oral 5 (15) 1 (33)
Opiate, intravenous 21 (62) 1 (33)
Antiepileptics (e.g. gabapentin, pregabalin) 8 (24)
Other (e.g. ketamine, clonidine, benzodiazepines) 13 (38) 1 (33)
Pain severity
Step 1 (paracetamol) 2 (6)
Step 2 (paracetamol + tramadol) 11 (32) 1 (33)
Step 3 (addition of strong acting opiate) 6 (18) 1 (33)
Step 4 (addition of adjuvant medicines) 15 (44) 1 (33)

Treo treosulfan, Flu fludarabine, Thio thiotepa, Bu busulfan, Clo clofarabine.