Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;12:5657. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25696-z

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditions.

graphic file with name 41467_2021_25696_Taba_HTML.gif
Entry Deviation from standard conditions Yield (%)a γ:β
1 None 78 (74)b >20:1
2 NiBr2(DME), Ni(acac)2, Ni(COD)2 67–77 9:1–20:1
3 w/o ligand 24 >20:1
4 L7, instead of L8 66 10:1
5 L9, instead of L8 49 >20:1
6c L6, instead of L8 34 >20:1
7 NiCl2(PPh3)2, instead of NiCl2(DME), L8 66 10:1
8 Ph2SiH2, instead of (EtO)2MeSiH 43 >20:1
9 THF only 72 12:1
10 DMA only 59 5.7:1
11 K2CO3, instead of Cs2CO3 22 1.8:1
12 Na2CO3, Li2CO3, no base trace -
13 w/o catalyst or silane 0 -

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), NiCl2(DME) (10 mol%), L8 (30 mol%), base (0.2 mmol), hydride source (0.3 mmol), and solvent (0.5 mL) at 40 °C under Ar for 18 h.

DMA:N,N-dimethylacetamide.

aYields and product isomer ratios (γ:β) were determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

b1 mmol scale.

cLigand (15 mol%) was used.