. 2021 Sep 28;92(1):275–283. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01752-8

Table 4.

Comparisons of the newly established scoring system with the others.

Scoring systems	Category	CAAs (n =17)	Without CAAs (n = 186)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	PPV (%)	NPV (%)	Accuracy (%)	AUC	95% CI
Harada score¹³	High risk	9	101	52.94	45.70	8.18	91.40	46.31	0.452	0.303–0.601
Harada score¹³	Low risk	8	85	52.94	45.70	8.18	91.40	46.31	0.452	0.303–0.601
Egami score¹⁴	High risk	1	20	5.88	89.25	4.76	91.21	82.27	0.479	0.332–0.625
Egami score¹⁴	Low risk	16	166	5.88	89.25	4.76	91.21	82.27	0.479	0.332–0.625
Kobayashi score⁸	High risk	3	24	17.65	87.10	11.11	92.05	81.28	0.526	0.353–0.700
Kobayashi score⁸	Low risk	14	162	17.65	87.10	11.11	92.05	81.28	0.526	0.353–0.700
Sato score¹⁵	High risk	1	10	5.88	94.62	9.09	91.67	87.19	0.476	0.310–0.643
Sato score¹⁵	Low risk	16	176	5.88	94.62	9.09	91.67	87.19	0.476	0.310–0.643
San Diego score¹⁶	High risk	5	62	29.41	66.67	7.46	91.18	63.55	0.522	0.369–0.674
San Diego score¹⁶	Low risk	12	124	29.41	66.67	7.46	91.18	63.55	0.522	0.369–0.674
Formosa score¹⁷	High risk	8	108	47.06	41.94	6.90	89.66	42.36	0.473	0.277–0.669
Formosa score¹⁷	Low risk	9	78	47.06	41.94	6.90	89.66	42.36	0.473	0.277–0.669
Tang score¹⁸	High risk	5	68	29.41	63.44	6.85	90.77	60.59	0.458	0.252–0.664
Tang score¹⁸	Low risk	12	118	29.41	63.44	6.85	90.77	60.59	0.458	0.252–0.664
Hua score¹¹	High risk	6	26	35.29	86.02	18.75	93.57	81.77	0.722	0.566–0.879
	Low risk	11	160	35.29	86.02	18.75	93.57	81.77	0.722	0.566–0.879
≤6 months old (n = 16)	High risk	1	0	50	100	100	93.33	93.75	0.982	0.918–1.046
≤6 months old (n = 16)	Low risk	1	14	50	100	100	93.33	93.75	0.982	0.918–1.046
Newly established score	High risk	7	29	41.18	84.41	19.44	94.01	80.79	0.685	0.526–0.844
Newly established score	Low risk	10	157	41.18	84.41	19.44	94.01	80.79	0.685	0.526–0.844

AUC area under the curve, CAA coronary artery abnormality, CI confidence interval, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value.