Table 2.
Taxa showing a significant different in the abundance between CRC with control in the gut microbe-derived extracellular vesicles.
| Taxon | t-statistic | Unadjusted p-value | Adjusted p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum Firmicutes | 3.16 | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Family Clostridiaceae 1 | -3.36 | 0.001 | 0.019 |
| Genus Clostridium sensu stricto 1 | -3.36 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Family Erysipelotrichaceae | 3.28 | 0.001 | 0.019 |
| Genus Catenibacterium | 7.51 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Genus Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003 | 4.41 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Genus Turicibacter | -2.00 | 0.043 | 0.541 |
| Family Ruminococcaceae | 4.22 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| Genus Faecalibacterium | 3.41 | <0.001 | 0.020 |
| Genus Ruminococcus 1 | 2.96 | 0.004 | 0.089 |
| Genus Ruminococcus 2 | 2.23 | 0.028 | 0.028 |
| Family Lachnospiraceae | |||
| Genus Blautia | 3.78 | <0.001 | 0.012 |
| Genus [Eubacterium] hallii group | 5.04 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Genus [Ruminococcus] torques group | 4.85 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Genus Oribacterium | 3.79 | <0.001 | 0.012 |
| Genus Dorea | 3.91 | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Genus Lachnospiraceae UCG-008 | 2.52 | 0.012 | 0.230 |
| Family Peptostreptococcaceae | -3.25 | 0.003 | 0.033 |
| Genus Romboutsia | -4.35 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
| Genus Terrisporobacter | -3.56 | <0.001 | 0.003 |
| Genus Intestinibacter | -3.07 | 0.004 | 0.092 |
| Family Veillonellaceae | -6.10 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| Genus Dialister | -6.10 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Family Staphylococcaceae | -4.61 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| Genus Staphylococcus | -4.61 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Family Acidaminococcaceae | -3.28 | 0.001 | 0.018 |
| Phylum Proteobacteria | |||
| Family Moraxellaceae | |||
| Genus Enhydrobacter | -2.15 | 0.034 | 0.476 |
| Phylum Actinobacteria | |||
| Family Coriobacteriaceae | 4.78 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Genus Collinsella | 4.78 | <0.001 | 0.007 |
| Phylum Verrucomicrobia | -3.77 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| Family Akkermansiaceae | -3.77 | <0.001 | 0.004 |
| Genus Akkermansia | -3.77 | <0.001 | 0.012 |
The change of column (log2 fold) represents the multiplicative change in taxa abundance from CRC to control.
Negative numbers represent a trend of decreasing abundance in CRC group compared with control group.
The data (p < 0.05) was provied as bold values.