Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;2021(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2

Cambron 2006.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Setting: USA, mixed
Exercise groups: 1
Comparison groups: 1
Participants Number of participants: 235 (E1 = 112, C1 = 123)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (not specified)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: Some participants
Mean age (years): 42
Sex (female): 37%
Interventions Exercise Group 1 (E1): Strength, flexibility, and cardiovascular exercises to strengthen muscles and improve trunk flexibility; type = mixed; duration = 4 weeks; dose = low; design = standardised; delivery = group; additional intervention = none
Comparison Group 1 (C1): Other conservative treatment (manual therapy)
Outcomes Core outcomes reported: Pain (Visual Analogue Scale); function (Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 12 weeks (short); 26 weeks (moderate); 52 weeks (long)
Notes Conflicts of interest: Not reported
Funding source: Health Resources and Services Administration (Grant #R18 AH 10001)
Other: SDs imputed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Subjects were randomised to one of two forms of treatment.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Used manilla envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Not described
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) High risk Assumed not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Support for judgement was not available.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Overall, 61 subjects withdrew from the study: 38 during the trial intervention (13 flexion distraction and 25 exercise program) and 23 during the follow‐up (14 flexion distraction, 9 exercise program).
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) Low risk Patient demographics and baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared.
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) High risk Subjects were asked not to take any pain‐reducing medication prior to data collection at weeks zero and five.
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) Unclear risk Not described
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.