Study characteristics |
Methods |
Study design: RCT
Setting: Turkey, healthcare
Exercise groups: 2
Comparison groups: 1 |
Participants |
Number of participants: 75 (E1 = 25, E2 = 25, C1 = 25)
Chronic LBP duration: 60 weeks (moderate)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: No participants
Mean age (years): 36
Sex (female): 71% |
Interventions |
Exercise Group 1 (E1): Stretching and strengthening exercises of lumbar and extremity muscle groups; type = mixed; duration = 4 weeks; dose = low; design = partially individualised; delivery = independent; additional intervention = none
Exercise Group 2 (E2): Stretching and strengthening exercises of lumbar and extremity muscle groups; type = strengthening & stretching; duration = 4 weeks; dose = low; design = partially individualised; delivery = independent; additional intervention = electrotherapy
Comparison Group 1 (C1): Other conservative treatment (electrotherapy) |
Outcomes |
Core outcomes reported: Pain (Visual Analogue Scale); function (Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 4 weeks (short) |
Notes |
Conflicts of interest: Not reported
Funding source: Not reported
Other: None |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) |
Unclear risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) |
Unclear risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |